Adam Seychell <a_seychell@...> writes: > Ok. so when you exposed the resist for 2 minutes with the step gauge in > place, then what you observed at step 5 was slightly unexposed > photoresist. Regions under steps 1 to 4 therefore must of been fully > exposed. Correct ? Yes. 1 to 4 were fully exposed; they got enough UV to cure. Recall this is a negative resist, transparent = UV = cure = copper. Steps 6 through 21 were uncured, and the copper removed when etched. http://www.thinktink.com/stack/volumes/volvi/filmimag.htm#Calibration The step gauge is transparent at step 1 and opaque at step 21, so more UV means more steps 1..N cured. > The light at step 5 was attenuated by factor of 2^(-5/2) = 0.176. So > would I be correct saying to achieve the same exposure energy without > the step gauge then exposure time will be 2 minutes * 0.176 = 21 seconds ? I suppose. That would mean a 21 second exposure would cure some but not all of the film, hardly useful for PCB work ;-) > But this exposure energy doesn't quite achieve full exposure, so the > final exposure time use for PCBs will be somewhat longer. Yes. There is no point in calculating the 21 seconds result. That exposure will not cure the film adequately, and you'll never actually run your box for that time. The *only* number that you care about with the film is the time it takes to get an exposure that holds the step you need to hold. So once you figure out the exposure that holds the step you need, that's how long you run your box to expose your boards. It doesn't matter what step '1' works out to be because you'll never use it. > The data sheet for some resist I once had said 10 to 15 minutes hold time. The riston data sheet doesn't say, but thinktink says 15 min to 8 hours. http://www.thinktink.com/stack/volumes/voli/store/specs/m115spec.htm
Message
Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] UV LED box
2008-06-20 by DJ Delorie
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.