Adam Seychell <a_seychell@...> writes: > Thats what I have observed too. If you look at it under a microscope > then you can clearly see that line edges parallel to the print head > travel axis are much less jagged than line edges perpendicular to the > print head travel axis. Actually, that's not what I see. There seems to be a gaussian distribution of off-bys in both directions (vertical and horizontal). If I enable bi-directional printing, there's an obvious duality to that direction, but I think it's either (1) the various print heads aren't aligned to each other, or (2) individual dots don't leave the print head at a true 90 degrees each time. One of these days I'm going to write a program to print my image with only one of the jets and see, assuming I can wait all day for it to print ;-) > I'm sure most printers do not print at the resolution manufactures > claim. I see pixelation errors when printing 6mil (0.2mm) lines from my > Canon MP810. This printer is rated at 1200dpi (7 pixels in one 8mill > line) yet I see some lines are significantly wider than others > indicating the printer software is down converting the image to a lower > resolution. On my laser printer (600dpi) I don't use 6 or 8 mil lines. I use 6.67 or 8.33 mil lines, which are exact(ish) multiples of the print resolution. Otherwise, yeah, some lines are wider than others by a pixel.
Message
Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] inkjet resolution (was: UV LED box)
2008-06-23 by DJ Delorie
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.