Very good explanation of the difference between piezo and thermal/bubblejet. However, despite the website describing thermal heads as temporary, part of the ink cartridge, and short-lived, I've used two Canon BJC 610 inkjet printers for quite a few prints without ever replacing the heads, sold one and the other finally did clog badly but it was so old by then that I bought another printer rather than put herculean effort or pay $12.95 for a new head. Then a Canon BJC 5000 that clogged badly enough to require replacement about every 6 ink replacements. Now a Canon BJC 6000 that I've used quite a bit but has never (knock on wood, ow my head!) yet needed a new print head. With Stefan's experience and your's and others observations, I am going to see if I can pick up a working Epson inkjet since they are Piezo. Loads of Epson 600's in the thrift stores here lately, but they don't have a straight through paper path. Are there any Epson inkjets that have a rear feed slot and a straight paper path? Steve Greenfield --- In Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com, "grantfair2001" <grant.fair@s...> wrote: > Stefan - here is some basic info on printhead design, for what it is > worth. > > https://www.inkzone.com/resource/ptech.cfm > > I am wodering if the heat in your print head acted as a catalyst and > the polymers cross linked. That would make a "clog" I think. > > A chemist friend who develops plastics for Dupont thought that the > potassium permanganate you probably used acted as a catalyst and > triggered cross-linking. I will ask him about the heat theory, too, > when I get a chance. > > Grant >
Message
Re: inkjet printing - test and conclusion
2003-06-23 by Steve
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.