I've seen many poor prints from inkjets too. The trick is to use the corrct ink/printer and transparency combination. The differences between the worst and the best is incredible. rolanyang wrote: > It's not that I've had amazing success with laser, but I > haven't ever been able to make a quality transparency > with the inkjet (Epson 800). It may have been the print > mode or the plastic material, but the final art has > always been somewhat ... transparent :( > > --- In Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com, adam Seychell > <adam_seychell@y...> wrote: > Professionals use inkjets when > >>it comes to making photomask for silk screening, ect. >>If you have had good success with laser printed photomasks, >>then please tell us more. >> >>With the epson inkjet/epson transparencies I can expose >>boards at least five times the normal period and still have >>perfect masking of the image. The only problem with such >>long exposures is excessive light undercut. >> >> >>rolanyang wrote: >> >>>Laser printers can be bought for roughly $100 these days. >>>It's hard to beat the consistent output and quality >>>of toner on transparencies. Also, if you're adventurous >>>enough, they are good for direct iron-on transfer to PCB's. >>> >>>At that price, it's almost not worth hours of fiddling >>>with inkjets - unless someone figures out how to >>>do the direct inkjet resist to pcb method. >> > > > > > Be sure to visit the group home and check for new Bookmarks and files: > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Homebrew_PCBs > > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: > Homebrew_PCBs-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ > >
Message
Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: Inkjet Transparencies
2003-06-30 by Adam Seychell
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.