>I've mentioned this before - I get quite good results (down to 10/10 mils) >with an old LaserJet IIIp and cheap tracing paper. Looking at the output >with a powerful magnifier it's not bad - the edges are quite sharp but there >are lots of small blank regions. For the record, it's got a standard HP >cartridge and the density is set to maximum. It's better with LaserStar film >but the stuff is a lot more expensive than tracing paper. I also get good results with the laser/tracing paper combo BUT, it also depends on the method used and that's IMHO the reason why so many people post even conflicting experience. The laser/tracing paper works ok here (if not to say very good) for standard photo sensitive coated base material. Since I started to use my through hole plating station, I can't do it this way anymore and have to use a photoresist laminate instead. This laminate is MAGNITUDES more ligh sensitive. I.e. the exposure time is only 15 seconds (90 seconds with the tracing paper/lasser combo) and with this laminate it's no longer possible for me to use the laser. I tried with different kind of papers and foils to no avail. Same story also with the HP DeskJet 950Csi I happened to have also. A friend then told me to try an Epson Stylus C62. I first did not wanted to belive it, but now that I have one I must say that the results are stunning. I use the Avery (Zweckform) 2502 foils with it and as others pointed out the foil used also makes a huge difference. Markus
Message
Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: Inkjet Transparencies
2003-06-30 by Markus Zingg
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.