I realize that reliability problems are a possibility. But even if that were the case, I think this is a quite valuable technique for some quick prototyping. Personally, I find it more practical (and safer, in terms of accidentally ruining the pcb) than soldering tiny via holes. Without proper and thorough testing of this one specific technique though, claiming that one "asks for" long run reliability problems does not really go beyond speculation now, does it? In any case, one might be better off leaving the job to professionals if long run reliability is a big concern. Just my personal opinion... -Tolga On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 1:02 AM, leon Heller<leon355@btinternet.com> wrote: > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Stefan Trethan" <stefan_trethan@...> > To: <Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com> > Sent: Wednesday, September 02, 2009 6:26 PM > Subject: Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Vias > >>I think you would be asking for reliability problems in the long run >> with riveted vias like this. >> I already cringe at the thought of flush-soldering press fit header >> pins, but this one I really wouldn't want to risk. > > PCB eyelets were very popular 40 years ago before through-hole plating > became commonplace, and were reliable enough. When I worked for Rank-Xerox > they were used on all the PCBs in the copiers we made. > > Leon > >
Message
Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Vias
2009-09-03 by Tolga Abaci
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.