Sounds like pretty good stuff, I'm just glad this water-based stuff doesn't use any solvents or VOCs and just uses soap and water for cleanup and sodium carbonate to develop. I haven't had any problems mounting the boards with a couple dabs of hot glue on the computer fan that I use to spin it. Getting it off is a little more challenging :-) , trying to pry the board off the fan while it's still wet and not marking it up with fingerprints. I take care to pre-balance the thing by eyeballing the way it spins per distance from a reference point and moving it until I have a nice even spin. The fan works surprisingly well, coming up to speed slowly and gradually increasing to a speed that seems just about right for getting a thin coat without it being too thing. Takes a couple minutes to spin and a couple more in the oven. Regards, Larry On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 2:33 PM, designer_craig <cs6061@...> wrote: > > > Back in the 70's and 80' I used Shipley AZ111 which was solvent based. I > built a spin coater that consisted of an old fractional hp fan motor mounted > in a 16" x 16" box to catch the extra spun off resist. I think the speed was > 1700 rpm but I don't remember. I mounted a .063" thick aluminum disk to an > old fan hub with some flat head screw, the fan blades had been removed. I > think the disk was about 8 inches in dia. The trick was to get it spinning > smoothly and not wobble, a little bending and some aluminum tape on the > underside to balance the disk and it worked great. > > I would clean up the board put somme double stickey tape on the disk and > mount the board. Trick is to get the board centered so it doesn't come > flying off. Retangular boards were the hardest but I was able to do a > display board of 10" x 4" with some difficulty. > > To get a good coat on the board I would flood the board with resist and rub > it all over with my finger, this was to make sure all the copper had ben > wetted, then I would spin it. Spinning didn't take long just a couple of > seconds. The AZ111's solvent would evaporate very quickly and it would make > cotton candy like strands if you spun it too long. You didn't want these to > blow back on your board. > > The board would go into a little DYI drying oven for 15 minutes than I > would coat the second side. Developed it in Shipley developer (sodium > carbonate solution). > > The AZ111 worked great it had nice sharp lines with excelent resistance to > the etchant, FeCl or hot Ammonium Persulfate. Used Acetone to strip the > resist after etching. > > The coating thickness on the water based stuff is going to depend on the > viscosity and how fast you spin it as well as the initial quantity. I am > sure temperature is a factor as well. > > Wish I could find this stuff again. > > Craig > > --- In Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com <Homebrew_PCBs%40yahoogroups.com>, > Larry Battraw <lbattraw@...> wrote: > > > > Hi, no I am not using a real roller-coating machine, just hand tools. On > > the suggestion of another member of this group I tried spinning the board > > after coating it and had _much_ better results. I took an old computer > fan > > that had bad bearings and hot-glued a bottle lid to the center of the > rotor > > and then hot glued the board with a few dabs of glue to the lid. I ran > the > > fan at a reduced voltage so it spun up very nicely and slowly and formed > a > > pretty uniform coating of resist although there were buildups on the very > > edges of the board. Two minutes in the oven at 200F and it seemed to do > the > > trick. There are still lighter patches and darker patches but I don't > think > > the variation is enough to cause problems and I'm looking forward to > > exposing my first board to see how well the resist holds up to etchant. > > > > Thanks- > > Larry > > > > On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 7:17 PM, jcarlosmor <jcarlosmor@...> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Are you using a real roller-coating machine? > > > > > > Those photoresists (AQ3000) are intended for professional use and > generally > > > does not accept any kind of fake/hobbyiest process. > > > > > > You could build a dip-coating machine which is much easier to apply > than > > > roller-coating. > > > > > > > > > --- In Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com <Homebrew_PCBs%40yahoogroups.com><Homebrew_PCBs% > 40yahoogroups.com>, > > > > Larry Battraw <lbattraw@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi, I recently bought the roller-coating version of this photo resist > and > > > am > > > > having a terrible time getting a board to cure properly. What > generally > > > > happens is that the board will cure somewhat well except for a big, > > > jagged > > > > "rip" through the center of the board's resist. It looks like a > ragged > > > tear > > > > in the resist and spreads out in sharp edges kind of resembling a > > > lighting > > > > strike with the streamers of the defect branching out. If anyone is > > > > interested I can post a picture of the problem. Has anyone used this > > > stuff > > > > and had any success with it? I've tried diluting it since it tends to > > > > capture bubbles like crazy when spread normally but that just results > in > > > a > > > > pool of concentrated resist in the center of the board and decreasing > > > > amounts as it reaches the edges of the board. I would really > appreciate > > > > some hints since the stuff has great potential to coat large/thick > boards > > > > that won't fit in a normal laminator with the dry film resist. > > > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > Larry > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: AQ3000 Waterborne Photoresist questions
2009-12-05 by Larry Battraw
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.