I just ordered a laminator and will give transfer another shot when it gets here. On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 5:41 PM, James <jamesrsweet@...> wrote: > > > > > > > Back to the toner transfer method. All my transferring was done using an > > iron. Sometimes it stuck, sometimes it didn't. Fine traces never did. > > Paper type made huge amounts of difference, could never find the right > kind > > I guess, even after reading many of the posts here. Maybe the laminator > > will make a difference, but I'm still up against paper selection and line > > widths. Perhaps you can shed some light on this, since the transfer > method > > may improve my making 2 sided boards. Now that would definitely get my > > attention. > > > > I've used several different methods and so far the toner transfer has been > by far the simplest, and I can use cheap surplus board stock instead of the > expensive photosensitive boards which I never seem to have in the size I > need. > > There are a few critical points, one is the right combination of printer > and toner, another is proper preparation of the board prior to transfer, and > another is the transfer technique. > > I use a $25 laminator now and have excellent results, I use my Xerox laser > printer (OEM toner) to print on glossy catalog paper, most recently an old > catalog from Action Lighting which has been working better than any other > I've tried. An iron works too, but it's more difficult to get it consistent. > > Clean the board with circular scrubbing with a Scotchbrite pad until it has > a matte finish, then wipe it off with a paper towel dipped in acetone. Cut > out the pattern you printed down to just a couple mm beyond the edges of the > board. Lay the pattern on the blank board taking care not to touch either > the printed surface or the clean copper. 8 passes through the laminator then > dump it in cold water. After 5 minutes or so peel off the paper, sometimes > you have to scrub it, but the thin really glossy stuff from the lighting > catalog just floats right off and leaves a perfect transfer. > > As with the photo process, once you tune the technique, you can get very > consistent results. For fine pitch SMT stuff photo is likely superior, but > toner transfer is nice in that you can whip up a board from concept to > finished product in just a few steps and very little time for under a dollar > in materials. > > > -- Thank you, Barry [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: Glue 2 pieces of copper clad back to back?
2010-02-12 by Barry Demers
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.