Stefan Trethan wrote: > i am not too convinced that the "darkness" is most important to be > measured... > > do you really have problems with the whole printout being not dark enough? It makes exposure time less critical if the ink blocks better. > i would be more interested in the quality of the printed tracks (the edges) > and the equal distribution of the opaqe ink (if it is good too at the > borders...) > > pinholes are interesting too... > > and i don't think one can get a smooth surface with acetone treatment.. but > try.... The idea is to *not* have a smooth surface. > maybe better then are inks based on solvents themselves... They'd probably clog less and dry quicker.
Message
Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: inkjet transparency testing
2003-08-13 by Russell Shaw