Stefan Trethan wrote: > i am not too convinced that the "darkness" is most important to be > measured... > > do you really have problems with the whole printout being not dark enough? Not really. I've mainly used epson stuff which is very dark, so I've never had problems with overexposure. I've also made a couple of boards using the HP stuff, which isn't as dark (sorry I can't give you relative absorption numbers :)) and also didn't have problems with overexposure. I agree that line edge jaggedness and pin holes are more important than overall darkness since many of the inkjets I've tested seem to look dark enough so that exposure times can be resonably flexable (+-30%). However the most importantly defect is banding due to blocked or partly blocked jets. This can easily create a discontinuity in a track. Other problems are ink splattering which I have seen with some refillable inks on my Epson. If the splattering is severe enough it can actually create a short between closly spaces tracks.
Message
Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: inkjet transparency testing
2003-08-13 by Adam Seychell
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.