My opinion is you should use plain old colophony resin flux. It doesn't need cleaning in most circumstances and is very cheap and reliable. And since it is a tree resin, it ought to be environmentally friendly. You can dissolve it in a little methylated spirits for easy application. But you don't necessarily need flux for SMD work any more than for throughhole work. I rarely use mine for SMD, mostly for tinning wires and stuff. Solder wire or paste contains enough flux as it is. Only if I change components very often using hot air and no fresh solder I add flux. ST On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 8:11 PM, <toftat@...> wrote: > OK folks, I have decided to take the plunge into building PCB's with SMD > components. I have been putting this off for about 3 years now, but the > availability of new parts in through hole configurations is undeniably > reducing. > > Having watched many youtube videos, it seems the most important part of > the process is the flux, however, having never bought flux outside of flux > cored solder, I am at a loss for what I should be looking for in a flux. > It appears that while no-clean flux has the appeal of not needing a clean > up step, activated solder is easier to use. Should I be looking at a > liquid or paste flux? > > I realize that there are probably as many opinions about this as there are > list members, but I would like to draw on the experience of the group and > hear suggestions... > > Thanks > > Anthony > > > > ------------------------------------ > > Be sure to visit the group home and check for new Links, Files, and Photos: > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Homebrew_PCBsYahoo! Groups Links > > > >
Message
Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Flux suggestions
2010-07-07 by Stefan Trethan
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.