> I know what you mean. > > I have been practicing with QCad for a few weeks now and have come to > the conclusiton that I just input all the components, spread them out > a lot, then autoroute. I get a MESS ! > > Then I LOOK at the components and the board and figure out where I > want the connections and some of the major components. move them > around then autoroute again. > > then I go back and move all the related parts like caps and resistors > so they line up better. > > I do find that you can place an LED in one of 4 directions, 3 of > which will cause traces to go off into odd directions and not 'flow' > ditto for resisrs and caps. > > I move those type around until the traces are shorter and the lines > more straight. > > When it is done, I have forced the autoroute to put traces where I > want them to a large degree and the board looks better. > > I have a board that looks like heck as all of one side of the PIC > pins were connected to things on the opposite side of the board and > all the pins on the other side had to weave themselves around. very > cluttered. > > Dave Yep, I no longer use the "representative" schematic parts. I make all my schematic parts identical to the chips themselves just so I don't end up with what you describe. The entire time I'm doing the schematic I'm also working out PCB placement. If I have to use lots on 90 degree corners in the schematic I know its time to rethink what I'm doing. Makes it a lot easier to decide which pins to use on MCUs and the like as well. For instance, I was using the default '4050 schematic part and didn't realize just what a mess the '4050 makes on a PCB. Once I saw this, I dumped the '4050 and went with a '245. Extra pins, but its very tidy - all inputs on one side and outputs on the other.
Message
Re: free standard PCB software and art
2003-10-13 by ghidera2000
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.