Hi Bertho, Thanks for the link to your test charts. I will use these when I have the Riston film in a few weeks time. At present I only have a small piece of already-coated board. You wrote: > I 100% agree with you about the limited performance of toner transfer. > > My question is: why exclude positive resist options? I haven't excluded them. Are positive photoresists available as film for lamination at home, or is it necessary to buy already-coated boards? If the latter, then I think the result may be higher costs than DIY lamination of negative photoresist films such as Riston, possibly with greater difficulty of obtaining whatever FR4 thickness and copper thickness might be desired. I don't know about shelf-life of Riston film, shelf-life of FR4 material which has had this film applied, and likewise shelf-life of positive film and positive-coated boards. However, in the message I quoted: * http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/Homebrew_PCBs/message/29673 Bob Balderstone wrote of pre-coated boards (negative or positive reist?): >> My experience is they have a shelf-life (older = longer exposure >> time) which again causes inconsistencies if you don't make many >> boards at one go. He mentioned no shelf-life problems with Riston-type (positive photoresist) film: >> Very, very good indeed once you've mastered the art >> of laminating. Definitely worth shelling out the ?10 or so for a >> cheapo laminator. Very cheap chemistry. No shelf life that I've >> seen. Very consistent results. Can also be used as a poor man's >> solder mask. Buy flat sheets (eBay China) not the cheap roll ends >> which curl up every other whichway when you're trying to apply it. - Robin
Message
Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Why use Riston or some other negative photoresist dry film?
2012-05-18 by Robin Whittle
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.