I've had good luck doing toner transfer with kitchen parchment paper. Rick -----Original Message----- From: Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of MIKE DURKIN Sent: Sunday, November 25, 2012 5:09 PM To: homebrew_pcbs@yahoogroups.com Subject: RE: [Homebrew_PCBs] Need comparing methods for smaller IC's (0.35mm pads and 0.15mm interpads area) Works for me too ... Was the toner transfer with paper or vinyl ? Mike KC7NOA > To: Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com > From: jcyoungs76@... > Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2012 18:38:43 -0500 > Subject: Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Need comparing methods for smaller IC's > (0.35mm pads and 0.15mm interpads area) > > i had no problems with the links try a different browser > > On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 5:33 PM, Malcolm Parker-Lisberg < > mparkerlisberg@...> wrote: > > > ** > > > > > > Your links don't work as your site says don't hot link when you > > click on them! > > > > Malcolm > > > > > > I don't suffer from insanity I enjoy it! > > Mene, mene, tekel, upharsin > > The writing is on the wall. > > > > ________________________________ > > From: DJ Delorie <dj@...> > > To: Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com > > Sent: Sunday, November 25, 2012 10:22 PM > > Subject: Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Need comparing methods for smaller IC's > > (0.35mm pads and 0.15mm interpads area) > > > > > > > > > > > > I have no problem doing 0.5mm pitch ICs with UV films and an Epson > > R280 > > (2880 dpi) inkjet printer, although I use the jetstar films and > > custom printing software for the densest artwork. > > > > 0.5mm is 20 mil (12px for 600 dpi), and the pads are 13mil with 7mil > > gap. You might be able to do get away with 8/4 pixels (8 pixel > > lines, 4 pixel spaces) on a 600 dpi laser printer, if you've > > practiced enough :) > > > > The DPI of the laser printer isn't as important as how accurately it > > can place the toner without the toner being "fuzzy" around the > > edges. Most of the time, the copper edges aren't straight - they're > > "lumpy" as the toner is sort of "thrown" at the paper and doesn't > > always land exactly where you expect it. The "lumpyness" depends on > > your technique, printer, paper, etc. > > > > For reference, though, here's 6/6 done with toner: > > http://www.delorie.com/pcb/lab/66-0.jpg > > Compared to 6/6 done with UV film: > > http://www.delorie.com/pcb/lab/6mil-front.jpg > > > > Here's a sample 0.5mm pitch part done with UV films: > > http://www.delorie.com/pcb/lab/6mil-0.5mm.jpg > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > > > > > > > -- > jeremy youngs > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > ------------------------------------ > > Be sure to visit the group home and check for new Links, Files, and Photos: > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Homebrew_PCBsYahoo! Groups Links > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] ------------------------------------ Be sure to visit the group home and check for new Links, Files, and Photos: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Homebrew_PCBsYahoo! Groups Links
Message
RE: [Homebrew_PCBs] Need comparing methods for smaller IC's (0.35mm pads and 0.15mm interpads area)
2012-11-26 by Rick Sparber
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.