On 07/06/2013 08:57 PM, brane2 wrote: > Dne 06. 07. 2013 16:10, pi\u0161e "Zoran A. \u0160\u0107epanovi\u0107": >> >> On 07/06/2013 06:53 PM, brane2 wrote: >>> I've just finished purchasing some of the material for our first >>> non-improvised lamp. >>> >>> I plan to use Osram's bactericidal fluo lamp Puritec 15W: >> >>> >> >> I would suggest not to use the lamps that you specified. >> UVC is not the wavelength band that is "the best solution" for PCB >> exposure. >> Try to find lamps that are intendend for "reprophotography", Philips >> carries some of these, that are in UVA wavelength band. >> > I already have two of those on cobbled up reflector. They are not as > good as low pressure Hg, but they are not that much worse. And they work > simply phenomenal as EPROM erasers. > > I will check those Phips lamps out, but since Osrams work well enough > for me and I have local source handy and already have the lamps, I plan > to deploy these first. > > Thanks for suggestion. > Watch your eyes, UVC is harmfull :-) -- Best Regards, Q Systems Zoran A. \u0160\u0107epanovi\u0107 zastos@... Skype: zoran.a.scepanovic http://zastos.com +381 63 609-993 -..- Watch this space.
Message
Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: For a DIY exposure box ... is collimated light an issue?
2013-07-06 by "Zoran A. Šćepanović"