Of course. I was thinking about twelve inches of lead just for an outer part of the shield. Im kind of lingering between Uranium and Kurchatovium for inner part. On a related note, I never jerk off outside of hazmat suit. Better safe than sorry. Chill out a little FFS... Dne 07. 07. 2013 15:37, pis(e epa_iii: > > If you are going to insist on building a device with lamps that are a > danger to view, then you should definitely consider the idea that this > device may not always be in your possession or control. It could fall > into other hands by any number of circumstances. I would highly urge > that you take precautionS from the design stage and implement them in > the construction BEFORE the device is operational. I deliberately used > a capitol "S" to emphasize that more than one precaution should be taken. > > As a minimum I would suggest that: > > 1. The light be completely contained with zero leakage when it is on. > > 2. There should be an automatic kill switch when the device is opened > and the light is exposed. > > 3. There should be a plainly worded warning permanently affixed to the > exterior of the device. It should state the nature of the danger AND > what precautions should be taken. > > I am not an expert on these particular devices, but I do have a fairly > good knowledge of optics and have made PCBs using a simple contact > printing frame and an external light source a couple of feet away. I > personally think that unless you are presently making boards with very > fine features AND are having problems with the process that you can > attribute to uncollimated light, then this whole subject is just a > waste of time. I doubt that very many home or small scale industrial > makers of PCBs have anything to worry about here. > > Make or buy a simple contact printing frame. Use an external light > that is about 1.5 to 2.5 feet away. Do not move the light or frame > while exposing the board. This should work in 99.999% of all cases. > Then, even if you are having a problem, I would suspect other sources > of trouble first. Or use the old standby, sun light. That is very > collimated: probably more so than any device you will construct. > > Oh, and do be sure that the emulsion or printed (ink/toner) side of > your negative/positive is the one in contact with the board. > > Paul A. > > --- In Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com > <mailto:Homebrew_PCBs%40yahoogroups.com>, Harvey White <madyn@...> wrote: > > > > On Sat, 06 Jul 2013 18:57:55 +0000, you wrote: > > > > ...<SNIP>... > > > > > There are reasons why EPROM erasers have a kill switch on the lights > > when the enclosure is opened. You can seriously damage your sight > > with these lamps, since they are made to be germicidal. > > > > Please read up on them if you haven't, and observe all the safety > > precautions. > > > > Harvey > > > > > > > > ...<SNIP>... > > > >[Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: For a DIY exposure box ... is collimated light an issue?
2013-07-07 by brane2
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.