A further correction . . . The LED I bought was advertised http://www.ebay.com/itm/120896174810 as: 380 to 385nm 1000mA 9 to 11V 900 to 1100mW output actually has a peak output at 394nm. I measured it with a monochromator from an old spectrometer. The monochromator reads correctly within 1nm for both a 532nm green laser and for the 404.7nm mercury emission line, so I think my reading is reasonably accurate. Half power was +/- 6nm. When I wrote my first message I thought this was probably the same as an identical-looking device for which there is a little more data: http://www.leds-global.com/ultra-violet-380nm-high-power-led-modules-p-7.html 375 to 385nm 1050mA 10 to 12V 400 to 500mW output However, there is a serious mismatch in the specified output. This LED runs at almost 10 volts with 1 amp, which matches the eBay specification exactly, but would be at the low end of the range for the p-7 device above. The shorter the wavelength the higher the voltage, so this is consistent with the eBay specification being for a LED with a longer wavelength than "380 to 385nm". I think the eBay LED is a closer match for this one: http://www.leds-global.com/uv-10w-390395nm-high-power-led-p-146.html 390 +/- 5nm 1050mA 9 to 10V 800 to 1000mW I don't have a chart for the wavelength sensitivity of Riston - I was referring to: http://www2.dupont.com/Imaging_Materials/en_US/assets/downloads/datasheets/mm500series.pdf which states that the "peak response" of the material is 350nm (nanometre) to 380nm. I was keen to get a high powered LED with as short a wavelength as possible. While I may have paid more than I needed to for a 395nm LED, the good news is that Riston seems to respond just fine to 394nm. Searching eBay for UV LED 10W 395nm I find various cheaper LEDs, but 395nm is not their center wavelength - they are typically 395 to 405. There are likely to be uncertainties regarding the actual wavelength of LEDs vs. how eBay seller advertise them. However, if a 3 minute exposure is OK at 30cm, which is fine for small PCBs, then I think a 3W 390 to 395nm LED would be a good, inexpensive, choice. For instance, this supposedly 3W 390 to 395nm LED: http://www.ledfedy.com/products/1-500w-led/3w-led/3w-uv-led-390-395nm-double-chips-with-star-pcb-1492.html costs USD$4.69 - not counting postage. A LED like this would be easy to run - just get a 12 regulated power supply and choose a resistor which drops (12 - 3.3) volts at 0.7A = 12 ohms. The LED would need a heatsink and the resistor would dissipate about 6 watts. - Robin
Message
Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] 10W ~380nm UV LED for exposing Riston & other negative film photoresists - actually ~394nm?
2013-09-18 by Robin Whittle
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.