Which one? RE: approach in favor of a purchased controller with a type K thermocouple. This cost USD 8.99 on e-bay from China. I have not yet put it into service because of the melted gears. On 12/30/2016 01:04 PM, Harvey Altstadter hrconsult@... [Homebrew_PCBs] wrote: > > Rob, > > The Passive IR gun type thermometer is only used for making initial > measurements, not for a feedback type control system. The PIR > thermometers have a distance to spot ratio. The Sparkfun unit > mentioned previously has a ratio of 12:1, meaning that at a distance > of 12 inches, the detector is reading the temperature in a 1 inch > circle. The thermistor and thermocouple approaches measure the > temperature at the point of contact, a much smaller area. With the PIR > thermometer, I could not read the rollers in my laminator at all > because they are surrounded by the heater structure except where the > paper path is. Those slots were too narrow for either of my PIR > thermometers. Another issue with the PIR thermometers, usually ignored > in the advertising, is that the emissivity of the surface being > measured has an effect on the readings. In plain English, this means > that two surfaces made with different materials could be at the same > temperature, but give different readings on the PIR. Surfaces with > multiple materials, if they fall in the reading area, will give a > reading that integrates the two readings, rather than providing a true > reading. > > I tried to use the RepRap thermistor in my original control circuit, > and found that while it works, the resistance vs temperature curve is > very flat near 200�C, making the controller action sluggish. I > abandoned the thermistor approach in favor of a purchased controller > with a type K thermocouple. This cost USD 8.99 on e-bay from China. I > have not yet put it into service because of the melted gears. > > As far as the location of the thermistor in the Royal laminator, this > is a mechanically simple location to use, and if we think about it, we > understand that there is no need to measure the actual temperature of > the rollers, at least in the original application of the laminator. As > long as the temperature drop between the heater and the roller is > known, the system can be calibrated for proper operation with the > thermistor mounted on the heater structure. The Harbor Freight unit > uses mechanical thermoswitches mounted on the heater structure. > > In our toner transfer case, it is not clear (at least to me) that > measuring at the heater is sufficient. Since we are putting single or > double sided thermally conductive boards of different sizes through > the rollers, I am not sure that the temperature drop is sufficiently > constant that we don't have to measure the temperature at the roller. > I was experimenting with this when my gears turned to mush. > > Harvey > > > On 12/30/2016 8:24 AM, Rob roomberg@... [Homebrew_PCBs] wrote: >> >> Where do you mount this device without destroying it and melting >> solder on the supporting >> chips in the toner work PCB heating path? >> How far do you mount it from the desired location where you are >> pinpointing temperature measurment? >> >> >> >> >> While I would agree that a Non contact passive infrared rules.......... >> >> I would like to some day compare the accuracy of the $20 passive >> infrared with >> the K type thermocouple and a simple thermistor. >> >> Noting that my ROYAL laminator heater control was done by a contact >> thermistor clamped to the aluminum heat shield >> behind a roller heater. >> >> >> When I was looking into thermocouple circuits and supporting chips it >> looked like about $15 gets that done >> and >> 5 cents buys a thermistor.... >> or maybe a dollar if it has wires. >> >> New Reprap NTC 3950 Thermistor 100K with 1 Meter wire for 3D Printer TSCA >> >> >> On 12/30/2016 09:02 AM, AncelB mosaicmerc@... [Homebrew_PCBs] >> wrote: >>> >>> Non contact passive infrared rules... >>> Get one of these... >>> https://www.sparkfun.com/products/9570 >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> >> > >
Message
Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Temp upgrades of lam's NON CONTACT PASSIVE INFRARED
2016-12-30 by Rob
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.