Rob, The link that I purchased from is inactive, but this is the same unit: http://www.ebay.com/itm/12V-24V-Digital-Temperature-Controller-Board-Thermostat-K-Thermocouple-Probe-/182145097075?var=&hash=item2a68b19d73:m:m-d0W2aqMiE7N3CDhyhvxFwIT has the thermocouple in a bolt, but I also bought several pieces of the bead type in case I need to have the thermocouple in contact with the roller. The one I bought operates from 12 VDC. A small wall wart would do, or as in my case, I bought a 110VAC to 12 VDC converter module from ebay. Very little current is needed. One like this would do: http://www.ebay.com/itm/85V-265V-to-6V-12VDC-6W-9W-2-3-x3W-900ma-12V-LED-Driver-Power-Supply-/251651394313?hash=item3a97978b09:g:CPcAAOSw1DtXI3rk Harvey On 12/30/2016 12:28 PM, Rob roomberg@... [Homebrew_PCBs] wrote: > > > Which one? > > RE: > approach in favor of a purchased controller with a type K > thermocouple. This cost USD 8.99 on e-bay from China. I have not yet > put it into service because of the melted gears. > > On 12/30/2016 01:04 PM, Harvey Altstadter hrconsult@... > [Homebrew_PCBs] wrote: >> >> Rob, >> >> The Passive IR gun type thermometer is only used for making initial >> measurements, not for a feedback type control system. The PIR >> thermometers have a distance to spot ratio. The Sparkfun unit >> mentioned previously has a ratio of 12:1, meaning that at a distance >> of 12 inches, the detector is reading the temperature in a 1 inch >> circle. The thermistor and thermocouple approaches measure the >> temperature at the point of contact, a much smaller area. With the >> PIR thermometer, I could not read the rollers in my laminator at all >> because they are surrounded by the heater structure except where the >> paper path is. Those slots were too narrow for either of my PIR >> thermometers. Another issue with the PIR thermometers, usually >> ignored in the advertising, is that the emissivity of the surface >> being measured has an effect on the readings. In plain English, this >> means that two surfaces made with different materials could be at the >> same temperature, but give different readings on the PIR. Surfaces >> with multiple materials, if they fall in the reading area, will give >> a reading that integrates the two readings, rather than providing a >> true reading. >> >> I tried to use the RepRap thermistor in my original control circuit, >> and found that while it works, the resistance vs temperature curve is >> very flat near 200�C, making the controller action sluggish. I >> abandoned the thermistor approach in favor of a purchased controller >> with a type K thermocouple. This cost USD 8.99 on e-bay from China. I >> have not yet put it into service because of the melted gears. >> >> As far as the location of the thermistor in the Royal laminator, this >> is a mechanically simple location to use, and if we think about it, >> we understand that there is no need to measure the actual temperature >> of the rollers, at least in the original application of the >> laminator. As long as the temperature drop between the heater and the >> roller is known, the system can be calibrated for proper operation >> with the thermistor mounted on the heater structure. The Harbor >> Freight unit uses mechanical thermoswitches mounted on the heater >> structure. >> >> In our toner transfer case, it is not clear (at least to me) that >> measuring at the heater is sufficient. Since we are putting single or >> double sided thermally conductive boards of different sizes through >> the rollers, I am not sure that the temperature drop is sufficiently >> constant that we don't have to measure the temperature at the roller. >> I was experimenting with this when my gears turned to mush. >> >> Harvey >> >> >> On 12/30/2016 8:24 AM, Rob roomberg@... [Homebrew_PCBs] wrote: >>> >>> Where do you mount this device without destroying it and melting >>> solder on the supporting >>> chips in the toner work PCB heating path? >>> How far do you mount it from the desired location where you are >>> pinpointing temperature measurment? >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> While I would agree that a Non contact passive infrared rules.......... >>> >>> I would like to some day compare the accuracy of the $20 passive >>> infrared with >>> the K type thermocouple and a simple thermistor. >>> >>> Noting that my ROYAL laminator heater control was done by a contact >>> thermistor clamped to the aluminum heat shield >>> behind a roller heater. >>> >>> >>> When I was looking into thermocouple circuits and supporting chips >>> it looked like about $15 gets that done >>> and >>> 5 cents buys a thermistor.... >>> or maybe a dollar if it has wires. >>> >>> New Reprap NTC 3950 Thermistor 100K with 1 Meter wire for 3D Printer >>> TSCA >>> >>> >>> On 12/30/2016 09:02 AM, AncelB mosaicmerc@... [Homebrew_PCBs] >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Non contact passive infrared rules... >>>> Get one of these... >>>> https://www.sparkfun.com/products/9570 >>>> >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>> >>> >> > >
Message
Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Temp upgrades of lam's NON CONTACT PASSIVE INFRARED
2016-12-30 by Harvey Altstadter
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.