I don't claim to be a professional and have the correct solution here BUT I DO HAVE A SOLUTION that works for me. STEP 1: ANY time I have a PDF file as a circuit board source I open that PDF file with GIMP image editor. If its more than one page then I only open the page I want to work on. The file OPEN options asks you if you want to open multiple pages as layers or images. I JUST OPEN ONE PAGE as an IMAGE. STEP 2: I use the rectangle image selection tool and then use the IMAGE drop down menu and CROP TO SELECTION STEP 3: I go to the COLOR drop down and use the THRESHOLD option and this IS THE CURE FOR PDF GRAYSCALE images because just opening this THRESHOLD option SLAMS THE IMAGE TO BE DENSE BLACK LINES on white background. I hit the OK button and then STEP 4: from the FILE menu EXPORT AS and select new-file-name.jpg which saves it as a jpg. STEP 5: I use my folder browsing to display the saved JPG then I select PRINT and examine my component spacing. NOTING THIS IS NOT DONE IN GIMP I always check what printing from file folder browsing will produce because GIMP may not be on ALL PCs I send this JPG to. IF the final paper does not have the precise match to components then I use STEP 6: back in GIMP and use the IMAGE drop down menu to select SCALE IMAGE and then make it bigger or smaller by PIXELS or PERCENTAGE or millimeters. Here is an example of accuracy just by the above method: http://www.learnmorsecode.com/laminator/pic/PIC16F628PROTO8d.jpg Here is one of YOUR PDF circuits... before and after THRESHOLD adjustment: http://www.learnmorsecode.com/tracetest/tracetest.html Have fun with GIMP. On 09/18/2017 06:05 PM, Harvey Altstadter hrconsult@... [Homebrew_PCBs] wrote: > > Chris, > > The pdfs look fine on the screen, but this is not the issue. We had a > discussion here some months ago about the density of laser printed > artwork. It turns out that the laser printed output is a series of > small particles that are fused to the surface and each other. Although > they are fused, the result is not a continuous line, but a porous one > that allows light to leak through. I have seen two work arounds. The > first is to make two transparencies and stack them, banking on the > fact that the pores will mostly not line up. The other is to use a > spray that increases the density of the print by chemically melting > and fusing the particles. > > There are a number of commercially available sprays. Do a Google > search on "laser toner darkener." The discussion here also mentioned > spraying with clear paint, such as Krylon. I tried it with either > Krylon or Rustoleum clear spray. The transparencies became much more > dense. I didn't try making any boards, I just was experimenting to see > if the artwork showed improved density. I did note one problem with > this approach. It was difficult to get the right amount of spray on > the artwork without puddling and causing the traces to distort. I > suppose that with practice my technique would improve. > > Harvey > > > On 9/17/2017 1:09 AM, chris@... [Homebrew_PCBs] wrote: >> >> I had a kind guy in Germany offer to convert photos of three existing >> mint, populated PCB boards that are the same as three others in an >> obsolete power supply that have suffered damage over the years from >> repairs and lifted tracks. the pdf's looked great and were, when >> printed "actual size" absolutely spot on. But the images from the pdf >> whether on semi opaque "tracing" type paper or clear acetate sheet >> are not fully opaque, unlike some commercial ones that i found in my >> secondhand UV box when I bought it. I used an oldish HP B&W laser >> printer here at home, then sent the pdf files to a commercial printer >> who used some sort of plotter to print to acetate, but still the >> tracks are only semi opaque, and when I expose photoresist board the >> pads and some tracks seem to have had patches exposed to some UV so >> they develop at different times to other regions. this the affects >> etching.... >> >> Could someone kindly look at the pdf's and say if it's an issue with >> the density of the black in them, as they sort of appear a bit >> greyish... I have etched boards in the past with photo resist and had >> no great issues, but these are being a pain! It may be nothing to do >> with the density of the tracks, it may be my techniques, but I >> thought i should start at the beginning as I am not sure just what >> magic he used to go from photos of the tracks on a populated board to >> pdfs. I can drill the finished boards on a mill with a DRO, all the >> components are leaded, save 2 small IC's that I will socket. I can >> use the DRO to perfect, accurate hole spacing for them. But first I >> need usable boards! The images in pdf form are at >> http://www.gatesgarth.com/traces.pdf I am working with Page 4 the >> traces only, mirrored. >> >> Thanks you, I am new here and in the UK, I have much to learn! >> >> > >
Message
Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] PDF image for photo resist transfer
2017-09-19 by Rob
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.