Thank you for commenting on Pulsar. They swear that it simple and easy and claims 6 mills. What was the size of your board and tell us more what it meant 'fair'? How dense was the board? Mike --- In Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com, "VaporWings" <dsc@d...> wrote: > Hi All, > I just signed up here and have been reading various post. For years I have been using just a dry transfer > method of making PCB by printing the image on normal laserjet paper using a LaserJet5L printer. I then > using a clothes iron to iron the image onto a scrubbed copper board. I put water on the paper and mostly > steam off the paper with the iron. The results are fair so I have been looking at better ways to do this without > lots of photo chemicals. In searching I ran across this site which has a these film transfer sheets. > > http://www.pulsar.gs (also www.dynaart.com) > > In doing a web search I ran across a web-site that had a really negative review of these sheets claiming they > melt in a laser printer.. This would be bad.. Some post here indicate people here are using them with > good results.. > > My couple of questions are : > 1. Do they really work and how well ? The claim of .006 seems pretty out there for this type of system. > I would be happy with .030 results. > > 2. Is their "EQUIPMENT" Fab In A Box package system of a laminator, Break/shear, and a drill press a > good deal and do they work ? I have been using a Large drill press for years which seems to work but > is bulky. I have been using a bandsaw to cut the boards but it really dulls the blades. A thought on the small > drill press would be to modify it for CNC down the road. Their "modified" laminator is $30 more than the > same one from Officemax (or so it appears). If the "Mod" worth it ? Does anyone here have web pointers > to the same type of equipment but cheaper. > > I read in a previous post that someone was wanting to build a better agitator tank. > I have been using an older version of this agitator tank for etching the boards. > > http://store.yahoo.com/webtronics/lowcosettans.html > > It has worked well for me. It looks like the newer version has a hood and is sealed better > then the one I have. > > Thanks in advanced, > Tom G :)
Message
Re: Pulsar.gs (Dynaart.com) TTS feedback requested.
2003-12-31 by mikezcnc
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.