Yahoo Groups archive

Homebrew PCBs

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:05 UTC

Message

Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Through hole solutions?

2004-03-04 by Stefan Trethan

>> Alan King wrote:
>>
>
>    Well few production items make sense to worry about having double 
> sided
> without through holes anyway.  And I'd still disagree with that opinion 
> on other
> grounds, in general it develops your layout skills far more to work on 
> good
> topology and have the minimum number of jumpers with everything on the 
> bottom.
> Trivial to go to some easier method, so hard to consider it a bad 
> habbit.  For
> the most part designing towards any goal strengthens your skills for 
> designing
> towards other goals, the particular goal for a particular case hardly 
> matters.
> I could design for months straight this way, and then still have no 
> problem
> doing something else, and I bet most other people could too..  I mainly 
> do SM
> single sided boards now for no holes because it makes sense, but it 
> hasn't made
> me bad at still doing a double sided when needed.
>
> Alan
>

I fully agree with that.
you have to work with what you get here and now, and using it the best way 
possible.
Keeping things simple is no bad habit i would say.

Also keep in mind how many "low end" electronics is still on single sided 
paper/resin board.

I hate it when i come across the most simple amateur circuits in the web 
which need to use
both layers, with a design complexity that would allow building them on 
half a layer ;-).

I think that is rather a bad habit.

I said before, routing is an art, many disagreed, but i still think it is 
so.


Another case is when you make a prototype of a production series, with a 
homebrew board.
then of course you can not route differently....


ST

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.