>> Alan King wrote: >> > > Well few production items make sense to worry about having double > sided > without through holes anyway. And I'd still disagree with that opinion > on other > grounds, in general it develops your layout skills far more to work on > good > topology and have the minimum number of jumpers with everything on the > bottom. > Trivial to go to some easier method, so hard to consider it a bad > habbit. For > the most part designing towards any goal strengthens your skills for > designing > towards other goals, the particular goal for a particular case hardly > matters. > I could design for months straight this way, and then still have no > problem > doing something else, and I bet most other people could too.. I mainly > do SM > single sided boards now for no holes because it makes sense, but it > hasn't made > me bad at still doing a double sided when needed. > > Alan > I fully agree with that. you have to work with what you get here and now, and using it the best way possible. Keeping things simple is no bad habit i would say. Also keep in mind how many "low end" electronics is still on single sided paper/resin board. I hate it when i come across the most simple amateur circuits in the web which need to use both layers, with a design complexity that would allow building them on half a layer ;-). I think that is rather a bad habit. I said before, routing is an art, many disagreed, but i still think it is so. Another case is when you make a prototype of a production series, with a homebrew board. then of course you can not route differently.... ST
Message
Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Through hole solutions?
2004-03-04 by Stefan Trethan
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.