> > From what you've written above, I would think that the h202 is just a > means to get oxygen into the HCL, so a bubbler/sparger and HCL is the > ticket? (with the usual concerns about muriatic vapors) > > Thank you in advance for any clarification, > > Ballendo > Yes it works with only a bubbler. However it is much easier and faster to use H2O2. it is so cheap i do not really care. Also i want no fumes from the bubbler because i store it in a room with loads of tools and i do not want corrosion (the bubbler has to run long times to get enough air in). It stays clear enough to see the board through it. I also noticed that with a little bit of excess H2O2 the etching itself is faster (maybe the Cu2Cl2 is instantly reduced back to CuCl2 by the excess H2O2, i do not know.) H2O2 is a very easy, clean way to get the oxygen in. 100% H2O2 has about 1,4kg that means there is half a kg oxygen solved in there, or not? O weighs 22g/mol, so .4 kg is 18 mol. (it is only 35% H2O2 so let us calculate with 6mol Cu weighs ? 60g/mol, so with the above O you could theoretically convert 360g copper. it weighs 9g/ccm which means that are 40ccm and with 35u copper thickness that are 1,1 square meter with one bottle H2O2 35%.. would be 62 100mmx160mm single sided. Not sure if this calculation makes any sense at all.. ST
Message
Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: muriatic and H2O2 -goods and bads ?
2004-03-24 by Stefan Trethan
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.