On Wednesday 28 April 2004 01:38 am, Phil wrote: > actually, I think that this could be done with what is emerging as a > some what standard CNC PCB machine (3 axis basis plus "special" > axises (axees?)) with a wrap gun attachment. I see two problems that > need solution: > > a) routing the wires. probably done by hand but you need to handle > the issue of binding and wire build up. I'm not real sure about how you'd handle this part. > b) ww socket tails (i.e. the wire posts you wrap on) are not terribly > accurate in their position. I've used em and its inevitible that > they get bent a little. Finding the post to slide the wire spinner > onto would be tricky. maybe just have a funnel on the wrap tool to > guide the sleeve to the post. It couldn't be very big, as close as those pins are to each other. I guess that's why the ends of the pins are pointed... > Of course, this is kind of a moot point as WW appears to be > dissapearing. Guess those pesky SMDs dont wrap very well... Is it? I can't say that I'm tracking things well enough to have seen that one way or the other. > But this does bring up a kind of wild idea I've thought about during > episodes of low blood sugar. Why not just have a direct wire > machine? Stuff the components (TH, of course) into a predrilled > board. Invert the board (securing the components somehow) Bending the wires will usually do that. > and then a machine strips a wire, solders it to a lead, moves (er, routes > the wire) to the next lead, cuts the wire (if terminal run), solders it > to the lead and moves to the next lead. There was a company in the > 70s (could still be around) called multiwire or some such that did > this for fast turn prototypes. It was quite expensive but it produced > some very complex boards fast. If I remember correctly, the first > intel 386 logic simulator (made out of random logic gates) was built > with this technology. I think fast turn PCB houses pretty much > killed their business. I can't imagine anybody prototyping a 386 chip with random logic gates...! Sounds like such a machine would be possible, but you'd need to have the feeding of wire, stripping, soldering, and so forth all working right. I guess we could lump most of this stuff under the heading of "automated assembly", which seems like a pretty good topic to me. Even if we don't go with your suggestion or with wire-wrap, something useful may come out of this...
Message
Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: wire-wrap
2004-04-28 by Roy J. Tellason
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.