On Sat, 03 Jul 2004 00:40:42 -0000, mikezcnc <eemikez@...> wrote: > OK, Stefan, I got the message, sorry for overlooking teh rules.. This > time, for a change, WILL BE about Mr Gootee and his suggestion. I > just made a trial and I used a laminator. That paper is no different > than most of papers suggested and tried by me. By the way, just a > remark, it is an inkjet paper with heavy 'photographic' coating. One > sheet is 30 cents. I noticed that paper wonders on its way out of the > Laser printer. In fact on two trials, the first time when using a > half a sheet, the image came out straight. The second time, even if > the whole sheet was fed into the printer, the image was offset by 15 > degrees, although still correct (I hate to think about registration, > if needed). I was using a laminator and a 0.032 PCB. It was hot, even > and thin enough. Paper is very thick and it soaked for 15 minutes. I > got maybe 60% of transferred image. Some lements transferred better > then others. > > I have to admit that my image was very challenging and I was > particularly impressed that certain three lines in a crowded area, > transferred really well (100%). That gives me hope that possibly I > didn't clean well enough (I really didn't). More trials to come. > Amazingly all SMD pads transferred really well, I just lost 40% of > traces. Mike > > In you and other posts i read about it beeing relatively thick. I found the thinner the paper the better it works. i use 100gram/sqm now. The cleaning is a big issue, i have occassional failures if i "cut corners" there.. ST
Message
Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: Staples #471861 as suggested by Thomas P. Gootee
2004-07-03 by Stefan Trethan
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.