Dave, The Staples paper recommendation is the fault of Tom Gootee - I am merely a messenger and I think he should be burnt first. I am only guilty of suggesting a glowing (literally) laminator H200 and therefore my life should be spared.... IT'S HIM! Mike --- In Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com, "Dave Mucha" <dave_mucha@y...> wrote: > <snip> > > > > > > So, when I happened to try the Staples Picture Paper, recently, I > was SO amazed at the quality of the results that I thought that they > should be disseminated immediately. I do not think that you are, in > any way, wrong, for emphasizing it, so strongly. It is STARTLINGLY > good. The toner adhesion to the copper is, by far, the best I've > ever seen. And it's capable of very finely-detailed traces: A week > or two ago, "just for fun", I tried printing a random pattern of > lines, using line-widths that varied down to ONE dot wide, at 600 dpi > (on my HP LaserJet 4, with HP toner), on the Staple Picture Paper. > Even the one-dot-wide lines worked perfectly! Under magnification, > the one-dot lines on the paper were *solid* (not "dots"), even when > they were at 45-degree angles (I had the "Resolution Enhancement > Technology" set to "off", and darkness set to maximum, and > dithering: "None", and graphics mode: "Raster"). And they transferred > to the copper perfectly, too! Unfortunately, I haven't had time to > try etching that test board, yet. > > Now I think if the post was a RECOMENDATION about papers and a > success story about the laminator, then we would not be watching > this discussion. > > I think that someon posted that there is no other way got peoples > dander up. > > But, your glowing recomendation will not prevent those who want to > experiment or who cannot access or afford the paper or laminator. > > Dave > > > < HUGE SNIP >
Message
Re: Digest Number 767 - paper type
2004-07-30 by mikezcnc
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.