FYI _____________________________________________________ Pete Brown - Gambrills, MD (Near Annapolis) Visit my personal site : http://www.irritatedVowel.com (wallpaper, western maryland ry, .net, photography, model rr) _____ From: tompiccirillo [mailto:tpiccirillo@...] Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2004 1:08 PM To: traintools@yahoogroups.com Subject: [traintools] Re: Answers from Micro Mark on their Etching Kit We're pleased to see all the interest in our Pro-Etch System. Over the two-year development time, we've tried many of the various suggestions in your messages, and found that the materials and methods we offer in the kit gave the best results, including the use of the inkjet printer over the laser printer. One correction...the maximum thickness of the metal/resist sandwich that will fit through the laminator used to apply the resist to the metal sheet is about .015 inch, and we recommend a maximum metal thickness of .010 inch. The system is capable of etching from one side or from both sides, so you can create parts with surface detail. We have had quite remarkable results with this sytem, even when compared to commercially sold detail parts made on very-expensive industrial equipment. We think the kit is a good value. Regards, Tom Piccirillo General Manager Micro-Mark --- In traintools@yahoogroups.com, "Earl T. Hackett, Jr." <hacketet@c...> wrote: > I've seen some pretty good samples made from ink jet artwork using a photo > etch technique. I ran into an interesting observation on another list. The > author was attempting to photo etch some circuit boards using ink jet and/or > laser printer artwork. He was having problems with getting a sufficiently > dark image. Then he heard that photo inks have UV blockers to make the > image last longer. He also realized that photo ink jet printers have a very > high dpi rating. He experimented and found that green produced a nice > transparent image in visible light, but the combination of the inks that > produce the image are completely opaque to UV. It was for more opaque in UV > than the black of either type of printer. > > You can etch thicker metal sheets, but it takes a long time. Figure 1 to 5 > minutes per mil depending on the condition of the etchant, temperature, and > agitation. A .025" sheet could take a couple of hours to cut all the way > through.. You also eat up a lot of etchant. One way to lessen the amount > of etchant consumed is to blank out any areas that don't absolutely need to > be etch. Just etch a narrow line - say .020" wide - around the part you > want. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Pete Brown" <YahooLists@i...> > To: <traintools@yahoogroups.com> > Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2004 12:40 PM > Subject: [traintools] Answers from Micro Mark on their Etching Kit > > > > Just received these responses to the questions I posed to Micro > > Mark. The answers are inline with the questions below: > > > > 2. What is the maximum thickness of material that the system will > > comfortably handle? The included materials are 0.005" thick. Will it > > handle, say, 0.020" thick materials in the laminator and etching > > tank? > > > > Answer: 0.005" thick > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
FW: Re: Answers from Micro Mark on their Etching Kit
2004-09-23 by Pete Brown (YahooGroups)
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.