That does seem like a huge amount of work to avoid paying for something. Much better to modularize your design and do multiple boards if you don't want to pay for it. Me, I paid for eagle and am glad I don't have to deal with that sort of thing. --- In Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com, "Stefan Trethan" <stefan_trethan@g...> wrote: > On Mon, 20 Jun 2005 08:53:51 +0200, David McNab <david@r...> > wrote: > > > > > Might try that - but there might be some different complications: > > - need for two schematics > > - constraint on the autorouter of having to interface the boards > > through fixed-position pads > > > > > What you end up with is a bunch of librarys that are all too small, better > get the real version now, if you get it eventually it makes no difference. > Also, i dunno about eagle, but i for one am glad i can pester my PCB > software manufacturer with all the problems it has (and there are plenty, > sadly..) > > > ST
Message
Re: bigger boards on Eagle Light
2005-06-20 by Phil
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.