Hi Curt, So the raster is scanned dot by dot no matter if cutting is needed, and with no regard to if the cutting is finished? That is a good KISS approach, and if you go slow enough there should not be problems. However in the future there would be speedup potential. Also, i didn't mean to use the groundplanes for return, i thought when you have large copper areas you might just move over them fast and not need to scan it slowly if there is no cutting to be done. I think the software should not be too hard to do, esp. if one uses a picture with the correct resolution already. You know, if someone would find a good plotter pen or inkjet head i could even do the componet legend on this machine. Wouldn't it be great to do _all_ PCB work on the same machine? Now... a solderpaste dispenser and a pick and place head... okok i'll stop dreaming, those things are for later. ST On Wed, 29 Jun 2005 07:26:33 +0200, curt_rxr <cwrxr@...> wrote: > Hi Stephen, > > I'll answer your questions from the Electronics 101 thread: > > ST wrote: > >> Yes, i have read rotating the electrode is good for edm. >> I don't fully understand electrode erosion of different materials >> tho. >> Rigging a pump would not be a problem, i'm quite used to that sort of >> thing with a watercooled PC by now.. > > > I used a combo dielectric duct and return ring around the electrode on > a EDM machine based on an HP plotter. The idea was to use gravity > feed of distilled water ( the dielectric ) through a copper pipe > around the elctrode which also provided the pulse return path. The > system had a spring to keep the duct in contact with the PCB and > attached plastic rod to provide capacitive feedback for depth. My > hope was to speed up cutting the board by leaving a groundplane > however the drag of the duct slowed things down too much. > > > > ST wrote: > >> I would like to PC control it like a normal cnc drill. > > You could do that with the A3967SLb s on a driver board and control > software on a PC. Maybe EMC? > >> How do you scan one line, at fixed speed or is it variable with >> current? > > The gantry moves along the x axis in 0.001" increments. The holding > torque of the steppers and the "stiction" of the acme threads holds > the gantry in place while the EDM head moves across the PCB and the > pulser removes 1 mil "dots" where there are no traces. At the end of > the traverse the gantry advances another 0.001" and EDM head then > "etches" another line. As I develop the system I'll probably follow > your suggestion and match the traverse speed to the pulse rate, but > for now -- Keep It Simple Stupid is the rule. > >> You said you regulate height to have the right current? What happens >> if >> the electrode is "done" and is not moved, will it enlarge the cut or >> just stop because the gap is too large? > > > The gap ( height ) is regulated by measuring the gap breakdown voltage > as outlined in the power supply reference. The EDM head is moved by a > stepper and the software puts out a pulse if copper is to be removed. > At the end of the traverse the gantry is moved another 0.001" and > the EDM head returns while cutting the next line. > > >> I understand the going line be line, a fixed width thing. But i don't >> yet understand fully how you move along the line, or depth, and how >> you "lift" the cutting over the traces. Plase clarify again. > > You don't lift the EDM head, you turn on the pulser and "burn" ( or > "etch" ) the away the copper you don't want. The height or z axis > position of the electrode is controlled by the gap voltage. > > >> Also, i think making ground planes would ensure faster cutting of the >> overall board? > > See my comments about the HP plotter. Since you can raster scan any > image and output lines in the resolution of your choice you can move > in increments of that resolution along the x axis without having to > worry about the pulse return path. > > > ST wrote: > >> I would really like making boards that way, i think. >> what do you think the resolution would be? > > If I could grind a fine enough point on the electrode my stepper and > leadscrew combo could "etch" 0.0001 inch dots ;D > > Doing double sided boards with SMT is a pleasure since the number of > holes to be drilled is minimized. You avoid all the mess and hassle > of TT. No board scubbing. No etching ( or mist or titrating ). No > paper residue. Fine line widths and best of all minimal hole > drilling!!! > > Curt > > > > > Be sure to visit the group home and check for new Links, Files, and > Photos: > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Homebrew_PCBs > > If Files or Photos are running short of space, post them here: > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Homebrew_PCBs_Archives/ > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > >
Message
Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] EDM PCB mill
2005-06-29 by Stefan Trethan
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.