On Sat, 02 Jul 2005 10:22:38 +0200, Les Newell <lesnewell@...> wrote: > I don't think the power supply has to be that complicated for this > application. Many moons ago I used to own a Sincleir ZX81 computer. The > Sinclair printer used special paper that was basically a thin coating of > aliminium over a black background. The printer used a toothed belt to > drag a metal stylus over the paper and wherever it needed to print a dot > it applied a voltage to the stylus and vapourised the coating. Being a > Sinclair product you can be sure the circuitry was very basic. Our needs > are very similar, the only real difference is that the coating is > thicker. > Normal EDM needs a carefully designed power supply because each spark > removes a very small amount of material. We don't need that kind of > accuracy so we can use a much higher energy density. I think that if we > use a large capacitor and keep it charged through a simple linear power > supply the sparking will be pretty much self regulating. All we need is > a big beefy transistor to turn on the power when we want to remove > material. The transistor does not need to switch for every spark, it is > simply held on for as long as we need to remove copper. As a kid I used > to cut patterns in aluminium foil using just a 12V car battery as the > power source and it worked quite well. > Les It would probably work with a simpler PSU, yes. However, you need to somehow limit the current at the electrode, or that big beefy transistor will get damaged at some point. If you use a resistor to do that the power wasted would be great (the guy who designed that complicated supply writes). Now if we use less voltage/current anyway it might well be acceptable. The charge current could be pretty much self-regulating if you use a transformer supply, i agree. Remember that guy used a rectifer right off the mains. I have two 50V transformers here that i could put in series, they can almost continuously supply the current i expect is needed for cutting PCBs. I'll wait for Curt's operation parameters (what voltage and currents he uses for PCBs, and if he uses the boost cct at all), then i will think about how to build that supply, and which simplifications to make, if any. I expect if you go really slow that "light duty" supply might even suffice for initial experiments. ST
Message
Re: RE : [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: Hmm, another thought....
2005-07-02 by Stefan Trethan
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.