Yahoo Groups archive

Homebrew PCBs

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:05 UTC

Thread

JetStar film

JetStar film

2005-12-01 by Leon Heller

I got my sample of the Mega Electronics JetStar film this morning, and tried 
it out on an existing PCB design, as promised. It worked very well!

My printer is an old Epson Stylus Photo 870, and I used a non-Epson ink 
cartridge. The printer was set for Photo Quality Glossy Film, according to 
the Mega data sheet, and max. print quality, black ink. I actually cut a 
smaller piece off the supplied sheet and fixed it to a piece of ordinary 
paper when printing with a strip of masking tape, as it's quite expensive.

The UV exposure time I employed was the same as I use with transparencies 
printed on a laser printer, on the low-cost single-sided FPC 16 
(fibreglass-paper composite) PCB positive resist material supplied by Mega.

Etching was in warm FeCl3, and took the usual 10 minutes or so, with 
continuous agitation.

Examining the etched board with a lens showed that the tracks were *much* 
sharper than I've been getting with laser printer transparencies (those 
always look a bit ragged at the edges). The board used a minimum track width 
of 10 mils; 8 mils shouldn't cause any problems and I might be able to get 
down to 6 mils, especially if I use the newer Premium Jet Star film (Mega 
also sent me a sample of that to try).

JetStar is available from Mega, Farnell and Rapid Electronics, and costs 
5.10 GBP for 10 A4 sheets. The Premium JetStar film costs 10.50 GBP.

I'll be using it from now on, for most of the boards I make. I will probably 
continue to use tracing paper in my laser printer for simple designs with 12 
mil tracks.

Leon
--
Leon Heller, G1HSM
leon.heller@...
http://www.geocities.com/leon_heller 

---
[This E-mail has been scanned for viruses but it is your responsibility 
to maintain up to date anti virus software on the device that you are
currently using to read this email. ]

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.