Yahoo Groups archive

Homebrew PCBs

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:05 UTC

Thread

resist

resist

2007-02-27 by wnnelson0

Here is a article on printing photo resist. Why would they deposit 
photo resist instead of a direct resist. 

R��sum�� / Abstract
This article presents a technique for resist deposition using a 
novel fluid ejection method. An ejector has been developed to 
deposit photoresist no silicon wafers without spinning. Drop-on-
demand coating of the wafer reduces waste and the cost of coating 
wafers. The novel piezoelectric fluid ejector is based on a 
variation of the design of a flextensional transducer that excites 
axisymmetric resonant modes in a damped circular membrane. The 
ejector is made by bonding a thin piezoelectric ring to a thin, 
fully supported, circular membrane. The ejector design is optimized 
for maximum flexure at the lowest order resonant frequency using 
finite element modeling. The resist, is placed behind one face of 
the membrane which has small orifice (50-150 ��m diameter) in its 
center. By applying an ac signal across the piezoelectric element, 
continuous or drop-on-demand ejection of the resist is achieved. 
Shipley 1400-21, 1400-27, 1805, and 1813 resists were used to coat 
sample 3 wafers. Later, these wafers were exposed and developed. The 
deposited resist film was 3.5 ��m thick and had a surface roughness 
of about 0.2 ��m. The ultimate goal is to deposit resist films with a 
thickness of the order of 0.5 ��m, and a surface roughness of the 
order of 30 A��. Such goals can be attained by using micromachined 
multiple ejectors presently under development, or with better 
control liver the deposition environment. In the micromachined 
configuration, thousands of ejectors will be made into a silicon die 
and thus allow for full coating of a wafer in a few seconds. Coating 
in a clean environment will allow the lithography of circuits for 
microelectronic applications

Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] resist

2007-02-27 by Stefan Trethan

On Tue, 27 Feb 2007 17:25:15 +0100, wnnelson0 <wnnelson@...>  
wrote:

> Here is a article on printing photo resist. Why would they deposit
> photo resist instead of a direct resist.


Most likely because the resolutions needed for making ICs are higher than  
what they could print directly.

ST

Re: resist

2007-02-27 by wnnelson0

--- In Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com, "Stefan Trethan" 
<stefan_trethan@...> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 27 Feb 2007 17:25:15 +0100, wnnelson0 <wnnelson@...>  
> wrote:
> 
> > Here is a article on printing photo resist. Why would they deposit
> > photo resist instead of a direct resist.
> 
> 
> Most likely because the resolutions needed for making ICs are higher 
than  
> what they could print directly.
> 
> ST
>
So the photo resist is easier to deposit in finer resolution? Why? How 
about if we try this too?

Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: resist

2007-02-27 by Stefan Trethan

On Tue, 27 Feb 2007 18:35:25 +0100, wnnelson0 <wnnelson@...>  
wrote:

>
> So the photo resist is easier to deposit in finer resolution? Why? How
> about if we try this too?


No, they seem to apply an even film, and then photoprocess it like normal.
Looks to me as if they are saying inkjet makes for a smoother and thinner  
layer than other methods.

ST

Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: resist

2007-02-27 by William Nelson

OK I see the total board is coated with a very thin layer, then they process as usual. Seems like
that would have to be one humongus inkjet to do boards fast.

Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: resist

2007-02-27 by Stefan Trethan

On Tue, 27 Feb 2007 20:30:41 +0100, William Nelson  
<wnnelson@...> wrote:

> Seems like
> that would have to be one humongus inkjet to do boards fast.


They coat wafers, not boards. But wide inkjets are not uncommon, even a  
cheap C84 has a head maybe an inch wide.

ST

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.