Sharpest tracks
2002-01-29 by Russell Shaw
Yahoo Groups archive
Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:05 UTC
Thread
2002-01-29 by Russell Shaw
Hi all, What methods do back-yarders use to get the sharpest PCB tracks? Photographic? Milling?
2002-01-29 by Steve Greenfield
--- Russell Shaw <rjshaw@...> wrote: > Hi all, > > What methods do back-yarders use to get the sharpest > PCB tracks? Photographic? Milling? I've never done PCB milling, but I have done photographic. And it is very sharp and professional looking, professional looking as your mask. I've used both positive precoated boards and spray-it-yourself negative. Both have good and bad points, mostly overcome by computer aided drafting. I've used drafting tape and those rub-on shapes, and I've used photocopies on mylar but I usually had to repair the masks (pinholes). Anyone remember that blue film? It was on a backing and you cut out parts of it with an Xacto knife to create a mask. A real pain in the neck, I hated the stuff. Just try and cut out IC pads with an Xacto. Steve Greenfield __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Great stuff seeking new owners in Yahoo! Auctions! http://auctions.yahoo.com
2002-01-29 by JanRwl@AOL.COM
In a message dated 29-Jan-02 03:00:04 Central Standard Time, rjshaw@... writes: > What methods do back-yarders use to get the sharpest > PCB tracks? Photographic? Milling? > > When I need best I can do without having a pro-shop do etching, I use contact-printing of negatives with Kepro stuff. But I haven't done a home-brew "photographic" in so long I don't even know what the various solutions were called! I have done nothing more complex than a 6-IC little lashup in years, and I get by with Radio Shack and whoevermailorderitwas "pressure sensitive" "rub-on" stuff. That works really fine, if done right, actually! Jan Rowland, Old Troll [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
2002-01-30 by Russell Shaw
JanRwl@... wrote: > > In a message dated 29-Jan-02 03:00:04 Central Standard Time, > rjshaw@... writes: > > > What methods do back-yarders use to get the sharpest > > PCB tracks? Photographic? Milling? > > > > > > When I need best I can do without having a pro-shop do etching, I use > contact-printing of negatives with Kepro stuff. But I haven't done a > home-brew "photographic" in so long I don't even know what the various > solutions were called! > > I have done nothing more complex than a 6-IC little lashup in years, and I > get by with Radio Shack and whoevermailorderitwas "pressure sensitive" > "rub-on" stuff. That works really fine, if done right, actually! I was wondering how much resolution the various methods get. I've found the best printers are epson stylus colour inkjets (400 and higher), used with epson transparencies (its coated with an absorbing layer instead of 'sandpaper'). Using a lightbox etc, i can get 6-8mil tracks and spacing. Works with precoated negative boards, and spray-on positive resist (PRP).
2002-01-30 by Zoran A. Scepanovic
Hello Russell, Wednesday, January 30, 2002, 01:14:08, you wrote: RS> JanRwl@... wrote: >> >> In a message dated 29-Jan-02 03:00:04 Central Standard Time, >> rjshaw@... writes: >> >> > What methods do back-yarders use to get the sharpest >> > PCB tracks? Photographic? Milling? >> > >> > >> >> When I need best I can do without having a pro-shop do etching, I use >> contact-printing of negatives with Kepro stuff.\ufffd But I haven't done a >> home-brew "photographic" in so long I don't even know what the various >> solutions were called! >> >> I have done nothing more complex than a 6-IC little lashup in years, and I >> get by with Radio Shack and whoevermailorderitwas "pressure sensitive" >> "rub-on" stuff.\ufffd That works really fine, if done right, actually! RS> I was wondering how much resolution the various RS> methods get. I've found the best printers are RS> epson stylus colour inkjets (400 and higher), RS> used with epson transparencies (its coated RS> with an absorbing layer instead of 'sandpaper'). RS> Using a lightbox etc, i can get 6-8mil tracks RS> and spacing. Works with precoated negative RS> boards, and spray-on positive resist (PRP). RS> Yahoo! Groups Sponsor RS> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: RS> Homebrew_PCBs-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com RS> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to theYahoo! Terms of Service. And I replied: Photographic method preferred. I use positive precoated boards and have a frend with typesetter who is producing the positive artwork for my boards. It is the cheapest method. The 3 sqft of artwork costs approx $4, and those 3 sqft ia a lot of boards! So compared with the price of Epson transpaerncies+ink cartridges (the most expensive part - printers are el cheapo, consumables are the company lives on), Someone's typesetter is the best choice. -- Best Regards, Zoran, Belgrade, YU mailto:zasto@...
2002-01-31 by caveteursus
Sharpest tracks for me were with lith film (Ilford)-- I use this for unsharp masks for BW negatives so I always have some on hand. I do almost all my stuff now using Avery Clear Full Sheet Labels (when I am in a hurry) or Xerox mylar film. With the avery labels I usually use 20 mils as the smallest trace width -- going to 10 mils I find is chancy.
2002-01-31 by David Saum
I find the main reason for the sharpest tracks is to run traces between pins. All other traces should be made as wide as possible to minimize the possible problems is gaps or smearing of traces. To go between pins you usually need 10 or 12 mil traces. I have no problem doing them by laser printing or copying pcb images onto plain paper, ironing onto standard copper clad boards, soaking the paper off, and then etching in a warm bath. Here is how I do it. http://www.infiltec.com/seismo/pcb-home.htm Note that it is extremely important to coat the boards after etching with something (floor wax!) that keeps them from oxidizing and allows good solder flow. Ciao, Dave The Inexpesive Seismometer Project http://www.infiltec.com/seismo/
2002-01-31 by Karlis
> Note that it is extremely important to coat the > boards after etching with something (floor wax!) > that keeps them from oxidizing and allows good > solder flow. I've been using Mar-Hyde clear lacquer (spray can) for this purpose. It leaves extremely thin coating which doesn't make any problems for soldering while completely eliminates corrosion. Works great for many years. KPL