> I was personally insulted and called a liar because I didn't > attribute two quoted messages to anyone. I have seen other > stuff too. Meanwhile I have had many messages banned which I > felt were totally ontopic. <snip> Sometimes people jump to conclusions on the LUG too. Just recently there was a discussion about the new 7.1 update for Logic. One person mentioned that they thought it was easily a dot 5 upgrade. I replied that I thought it was worth the $20 dollars that Apple was asking, but that I didn't think it came close to a dot 5 upgrade. Many list members were on me like flies on road kill. With some rather snide remarks to the effect that how could I know that without having tried it yet. Of course no one said anything to the person that claimed it *was* a dot 5 upgrade. Anyway, I think many LUG members just latched on to a small part of my post and jumped to conclusions. I wasn't in any way putting down the 7.1 update. In fact I specifically said I thought it was worth what Apple was charging. Somehow, though, when they read that I didn't think it was a dot 5 upgrade, they got very defensive. I suppose that is to be expected on any list that size, and of course I suspect many of the LUGgers have an emotional attachment to Logic that may make them prone to overreaction when something other than a "can do no wrong" point of view towards Logic gets expressed. Kamm
Message
[Logic_Cafe] What you can't say on LUG
2005-04-09 by Kamm Schreiner
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.