> When other people were leaving the list and complaining about a humorless > joke that when on for 10 messages, That's totally rediculous (and it was more like 3 than 10). People complained and left the list? But they all complained to you, not to me or the list? Now even if that were true, it would have helped if you had just told me that at the time instead of just telling me to shut up (in polite wording, but that didn't make much of a difference). > I asked you politely and adult-to-adult > to tone it down. I didn't ban your messages at any time, like the LUG does > daily. As I said, that's how moderation works, and at least the LUG moderators explain to you why they refuse certain messages. And if the effect was really that terrible, wouldn't it have been more sensible to prevent the message from being posted? > Nor did I ban you from the list. Was anyone ever banned from the LUG? Moderating messages is something else than banning people. > You are free to complain about now > publicly aren't you? I was just trying to weigh the good of the many versus > the goods of the few. If people are trashing the list and others are saying > they are going to leave, do I say nothing? I find it hard to believe seeing that it was not a big deal at all (I don't even remember the actual joke but I've seen jokes on the LUG go on longer without anyone complaining or even being moderated) and nobody mentioned any grief on the list itself, but my real point is that LUG moderators face the same issue (and can make the same mistakes), and there's nothing evil about using the moderating system to deal with it, as long as you clearly explain why (and consistently follow the rules; I guess that's where it goes wrong sometimes, I just never had that happen to my messages; I did get moderated a few times but with clear motivations). Maurits.
Message
Re: [Logic_Cafe] Re: What you can't say on LUG
2005-04-09 by Maurits van de Kamp
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.