On Apr 20, 2005, at 5:59 PM, Maurits van de Kamp wrote: > >> My search of XS-Key authorizations did not return any of my exact >> problem. > > Ok at least now I know what it was about. So why was it blocked > (according to > the moderators)? Jeremy Martin ( a guy I used to like 2 years ago) said... : "While we all agree Apple needs to take responsibility for Logic support (and as far as we know, they do still have to support Logic Pro 6), and while we agree they apparently have some poorly trained support people (at least unaware of the whole Emagic situation), we feel that complaining about this on the LUG is unnecessary. It's Apple who should hear your complaints, not thousands of fellow Logic users in the same boat as you. " While this looks innocent, It is one way. They decide what is appropriate arbitrarily. I think it is necessary. What I think does not matter. He was so ignorant he even spelled my name wrong. I must have replied dozens of his posts over 6 years. He may not have been there that long but he was there at least a few years or more. I knew his name. It is not that important but it shows how quickly he decided/read etc... I wanted other people to know what happened. I wanted to let them know what kind of strategy they should have talking to Apple since I got what I wanted from them. Why is this so wrong or inappropriate? I think it is politics, hypocrisy etc... I don't like it. Yavuz AKYAZICI http://yavuzakyazici.com yakyazici@...
Message
Re: [Logic_Cafe] Re: What you can't say on LUG
2005-04-21 by YAVUZ AKYAZICI
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.