Apple Logic Pro /LogicExpress Discussion group photo

Yahoo Groups archive

Apple Logic Pro /LogicExpress Discussion

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:06 UTC

Message

Re: [Logic_Cafe] Re: What you can't say on LUG

2005-04-21 by YAVUZ AKYAZICI

On Apr 20, 2005, at 5:59 PM, Maurits van de Kamp wrote:

>
>> My search of XS-Key authorizations did not return any of my exact
>> problem.
>
> Ok at least now I know what it was about. So why was it blocked 
> (according to
> the moderators)?

Jeremy Martin ( a guy I used to like 2 years ago) said... :

"While we all agree Apple needs to take responsibility for Logic 
support (and as far as we know, they do still have to support Logic Pro 
6), and while we agree they apparently have some poorly trained support 
people (at least unaware of the whole Emagic situation), we feel that 
complaining about this on the LUG is unnecessary. It's Apple who should 
hear your complaints, not thousands of fellow Logic users in the same 
boat as you. "

While this looks innocent, It is one way.
They decide what is appropriate arbitrarily.
I think it is necessary.
What I think does not matter.
He was so ignorant he even spelled my name wrong.
I must have replied dozens of his posts over 6 years.
He may not have been there that long but he was there at least a few 
years or more.
I knew his name.
It is not that important but it shows how quickly he decided/read etc...

I wanted other people to know what happened.
I wanted to let them know what kind of strategy they should have 
talking to Apple since I got what I wanted from them.
Why is this so wrong or inappropriate?

I think it is politics, hypocrisy etc...
I don't like it.

Yavuz AKYAZICI
http://yavuzakyazici.com
yakyazici@...

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.