> > I'm with you. But if you have a G5, isn't Tiger gonna give you better > > performance? > > I think Apple always says that. And so far it's been true (WHEN they claimed it). > Haven't they gotten the OS to be efficient > after all these years? I think its a lot like Adobe Photoshop or even > textbook new editions - they come out every so often whether there is > anything really new or not. It has more to do with their marketing plan and > revenue stream than it does a "must have" feature. I was reading that many > other people are similarly not thrilled by Tiger. Then again nobody has used it yet. And especially something like coreaudio is relatively new and heavily under development, so when we're throwing assumptions again anyway, one might as well assume that the whole audio engine has become more efficient and hence most likely faster. Besides, the internal architectural improvements between 10.1, 10.2 and 10.3 were impressive to say the least, and there I'm not talking about gadgets like Expose and stuff. I see no historical reason to be this sceptical about 10.4 (or Apple's claim that it has improved efficiency in, amongst other things, CoreAudio), and no other reason either, other then just wanting to be negative. Maurits.
Message
Re: [Logic_Cafe] New PowerMacs run Tiger only?
2005-04-27 by Maurits van de Kamp
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.