> 64-bit memory space isn't going to speed things up; in fact, I'd > imagine that 64-bit apps may well run more slowly on many machines. 64 bit space can indeed slow things down when you don't need it and badly implement it (and drag along 3 bytes when you only need the fourth). Could be that this is the case here, but high-end stuff like Logic will most likely know what to do with it. > reception programs, and now no searchlight. Those apps, even when "idle" > are still lurking in the backgroun - taking up ram, taking clock cycles to > check if the computer is idle so they can spring to life, or sending out > internet messages. With the fragility of music on G5, I would not take any > chances. I agree that less is better, but what fragility? With my G4 I was constantly maxing out my processor, but now I jumped from 400MHz to 2x1.8GHz, the least of my worries are a few more background processes. (Btw, even before Tiger you already have a few dozen background tasks running). Besides, coreaudio being part of the operating system and knowing that it has to get its data out in time, will eat processor time away from apps like Spotlight or Dashboard when it needs to. And apps don't eat cycles to check if the computer is idle, they GET cycles when it is. (Unix-based system have this neat thing called "nice-levels" and any "expert" should know what that means). Sorry to be sceptical about the sceptic, but his sceptisism seems to have more of a marketing basis than a technical one. And the real advantages of Tiger aren't in the fancy gadgets at all, they are in the technical details and we've seen a few links about them here already that show it's not just all hype. Maurits.
Message
Re: [Logic_Cafe] Re: Re: Re: New PowerMacs run Tiger only?
2005-05-02 by Maurits van de Kamp
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.