Apple Logic Pro /LogicExpress Discussion group photo

Yahoo Groups archive

Apple Logic Pro /LogicExpress Discussion

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:06 UTC

Message

[Logic_Cafe] intel

2005-06-06 by Kamm Schreiner

> According to Jobs, if devs have been using XCode its only a 
> 'matter of minutes to recompile'.. Microsoft Office 
> apparently needs no recompiling already.. Wolfram took a 
> matter of minutes and only needed about 20 lines of code 
> changed to bring it up to speed.. I would HOPE Logic is being 
> developed in a similar matter, you would think Apple would 
> have been planning on this and made appropriate measures awhile ago..

Xcode is a 'C' based programming language and if a program is written
totally with XCode, then yea, I suspect it would be dead easy to recompile.
I can't see Office needing the kind of optimization that Logic might.
However, I *don't* know that Logic uses any assembly language routines. It
might not. I'm only suggesting that if it does, it may not be trivial to
convert it to run on an x86 CPU.

We're just going to have to wait to see I suspect.

Kamm

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.