> According to Jobs, if devs have been using XCode its only a > 'matter of minutes to recompile'.. Microsoft Office > apparently needs no recompiling already.. Wolfram took a > matter of minutes and only needed about 20 lines of code > changed to bring it up to speed.. I would HOPE Logic is being > developed in a similar matter, you would think Apple would > have been planning on this and made appropriate measures awhile ago.. Xcode is a 'C' based programming language and if a program is written totally with XCode, then yea, I suspect it would be dead easy to recompile. I can't see Office needing the kind of optimization that Logic might. However, I *don't* know that Logic uses any assembly language routines. It might not. I'm only suggesting that if it does, it may not be trivial to convert it to run on an x86 CPU. We're just going to have to wait to see I suspect. Kamm
Message
[Logic_Cafe] intel
2005-06-06 by Kamm Schreiner
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.