>> X does have a lot of advantages, but it exerts a heavy load because of the high resolution graphics, >>and animated tools bars, and bouncing icons etc. > More detailed graphics only require more CPU power while they are drawn >,... this is already pretty negligeable. It's nothing more than blitting a few bitmaps into video memory. I don't know why we are arguing about this. I think its common knowledge that X is better and more modern but it also is signficiantly less efficient in many ways. If you go look on the box for something like Native Instruments plugs or Arturias Moog, you will see the requirements when running system 9 to be something like 500 mhz and 733 mhz if you are running X. That means to run the same plug you need almost 50% more processor speed to compensate for the lower efficiency of X. I have used several computers over the past few years with both 9 and X, and although 9 is looking more and more dated, it actually reacts faster. About graphics being redrawn - they are re-drawn much more often than you might imagine. If you have several windows open, any time one obscures another, and you click on the back on, its redrawn. Anytime you click on any window I believe causes it to be redrawn (note the grayed out title bar change). Whenever you have things like graphic audio meters or knobs or things that move - they must be redrawn each time there is any movement. If you turn a knob on a softsynth I think each fraction of a turn causes a redraw. If there were not the case, then you could not see the pointer for the knob move until you reached the stoping point. But you actually see it moving as you turn it. So it might cause 50 redraws for that window in a second. >So yes the fancy graphics make the look&feel slightly slower, but the decrese in real computational power >(which we see in less possible tracks with Logic etc) comes from the more complex architecture of OSX. Ok that might be true. It might be because of the better multi-process threading which 9 doesn't have. Actually there are a lot of processes going on at any given time in X. >Switching off all fancy graphic things (which in fact you can) doesn't have much influence on that. How do you do that?
Message
Re: [Logic_Cafe] Speeding up OSX
2005-09-14 by GAmoore@aol.com
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.