>On 19/01/2006, at 11:41 AM, Troy D. wrote: > >> From what I see the Bus Object is just a subset of the Aux Object. >> Can someone tell me one good reason why I shouldn't just delete all >> the Bus Objects and just use Aux Objects exclusively? > >Because you still need bus objects to sub mix a number of tracks. >It's not possible to assign a track directly to an Aux object. It';s >also not possible to assign a track effect send directly to an Aux. >You still need a bus for that. > >Regards > But a "bus object" is not a "bus". They are two different things. I can (and have) deleted my bus objects and routed signals from a channel Out to an Aux Object, using a bus. Though I haven't tried it, I'm sure I could send a signal from the Send in the same manner as well. In other words, a "Bus" is just the virtual wire and it remains and functions just fine without a Bus Object. Aux Objects can function in place of a Bus Object just fine. And an Aux Object has Sends so you can do things you can't do with a Bus Object: like sending a portion of your Drum Group signal to a reverb that you are ALSO using on your Vocal Group.
Message
Re: the bus stops here
2006-01-20 by Troy D.
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.