Apple Logic Pro /LogicExpress Discussion group photo

Yahoo Groups archive

Apple Logic Pro /LogicExpress Discussion

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:06 UTC

Message

Re: [Logic_Cafe] Re: the bus stops here

2006-01-21 by Paul Najar


On 21/01/2006, at 5:36 PM, Teeroy wrote:

Aux objects do have a lot in common with busses and even additional functionality

:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
Paul Najar
Jaminajar Music Production
www.jaminajar.com


Hate to disagree but you are incorrect. A Bus Object can't do a *single* task that can't be
done by an Aux Object.

What is it you're disagreeing with here? I'm saying the same thing you are. Bus and aux are similar functionality but aux has more features.

A Bus Object is exactly the same as an Aux Object except a bus is
hardwired to a certain bus as its only Input option and a Bus Object has no Sends.

Once again, what are you disagreeing with in my last post?

After deleting all Bus Objects I can still route a Send signal (or Output signal) from a Track
Object, Input Object, Instrument Object, or Aux Object to a bus that terminates into an Aux
Object.

Precisely what I said in my last post.

I challenge you, or anyone else reading this thread, to explain (in detail) one thing that a Bus
Object can do that an Aux Object can't. JUST ONE THING. GO AHEAD, I DARE YA!!!

You're missing my point completely. All I tried to point out was that track & instrument signals have to go through a bus to get to an aux. Weather the bus is created in the environment or not. That's it. This statement was in response to your original question which was:

From what I see the Bus Object is just a subset of the Aux Object.
Can someone tell me one good reason why I shouldn't just delete all
the Bus Objects and just use Aux Objects exclusively?

PN

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.