--- Kamm Schreiner <kamm@...> wrote: > In all seriousness though, this issue really hits home for a lot of people > in the music business. > Kamm And the 'grammy winners don't look poor' argument is just so irrelevant. For every hugely rich celebrity rock star, there are countless bands and individual musicians who are pushing self-produced cd's at concerts, or who will never see more than the advance that they spent on studio time, and an atmosphere of rampant and easy file 'sharing' affects their bottom line infinitely more than it affects Metallica, Madonna, or any other multi-platinum artist. More and more, I find that younger kids don't consider copying a cd to be any sort of a problem, and we need to educate them about the issue. At least when I was a broke high school and college student, I KNEW that taping a cd was theft, but it was all I could afford so I did it anyway, but I also knew that if I really liked the cd, I'd buy it when I could afford it, because my copy was so inferior. There is some validity to the argument that a broke-ass college kid downloading songs isn't affecting anyone's margins, because they wouldn't have bought it anyway. However, the quality of the copies, even mp3 copies, is good enough for most folks that they have no incentive to pay for a high quality original, later. I know that I own legal copies of all the cd's I taped back in college, but I don't think that will be true of the people I see with, literally, thousands of downloaded cd's. That's why the online music stores are such a good thing for the industry. Prices are cheap, but they are selling an inferior product, so that's ok. More importantly, given the quality of today's music, it is a great venue for buying individual songs. I think that most of the music I like really deserves to be heard in the context of the whole album, and whole albums of my favourite artists are often of high quality from start to finish. Every once in a while, however, a popular song grabs my interest, and we all know that for many 'popular' artists, the rest of the album is full of garbage being used to pad the one or two 'singles' on the cd, so a $.99 purchase of a single song at iTMS is perfect. I pay for all kinds of things I would never have bothered with a few years ago, and my music collection is richer as a result. Even worse than the file sharers, however, are the record store employees. Is anyone here friends with someone who works at a music store? Those people bring home any cd they like, copy it, then bring it back the next day to be rewrapped and sold as new. And they are getting full cd-quality copies, not inferior mp3 or aac versions. I have friends who work at various record stores, and the theft is just endemic, and their employers encourage it. No matter how much I try to impress upon them that they are stealing real money from real people, it doesn't change their behaviour. And most of them are into the kind of independant artists who are truly affected by that kind of theft, too. It ticks me off. --sam __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? The all-new My Yahoo! - Get yours free! http://my.yahoo.com
Message
RE: [Logic_Cafe] Sharing: was Lawsuits
2005-01-04 by Samuel Gendler
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.