On Jan 17, 2005, at 11:31 PM, Maurits van de Kamp wrote: > I do, and in fact many have already reported about it to this list. > That's the > whole point you miss when you think in single bottlenecks: You seem > to think > when Cubase outperforms Logic, the harddisk speed can't make a > difference > anymore. Well it can, and on top of that, if you switch to SCSI > you'll need > less CPU to deal with the disk IO so not only wil both Cubase and > Logic be > faster, the difference will also be smaller. > I see. So what is the breakdown? How many of what bit depth track are you able to play in logic with and without SCSI?
Message
Re: [Logic_Cafe] SATA versus SCSI
2005-01-18 by dennis gunn