From: GAmoore@... >I actually thought about it quite hard but I think the dual 1.8 is the way to >go. But you have to be sure you're not going to want to install more than 4GB of RAM, which is a fatal problem for what I'm doing (using large sample libs). >Macworld had an article (which you can find online) which compared them, >and the dual 2.0 is 9% faster overall, and the 2.5 is only 12% faster on many >of the tasks despite a 50% increase in price (compared to the 1.8 dual). > >But their benchmarks don't include audio. I made my own index which is CPU >speed X Bus speed. >1.8 x 900 = 1620 >2.0 x 1000 = 2000 >2.5 x 1.25 = 3125 > >Based on that the dual 2.5 is almost 100% faster for only 50% more money. But >its a lot of extra money. And the dual 1.8 is a significant improvement >already so the extra $900 might be better spent on waiting for the >G6 next year. I have a feeling that's all false maths. :) -- Nick Batzdorf 818/905-9101, cell 590-9101, fax 905-5434
Message
Re: Re: Disappointed
2005-02-03 by Nick Batzdorf
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.