Get a dual. Hands down faster. Maybe not as indicated by the benchmark tests, but personal experience with logic and music apps as my only apps running on my dual g4 1000MHz w 1.5Gb of memory, the way logic uses the dual processors makes for really astounding results. I am running Logic 6 pro ver 6.4.1 on OSX ver 10.2.8 with no problems of any kind can do lots of tracks and audioinstruments without problems never have to restart as a matter of fact I have mine on a UPS and never shut it off I just put it to sleep. I run as many as 4-5 plugins on 40+ tracks to 8 stereo buses with 2-4 plugs on each bus as well. I won't upgrade to Logic 7 for several basic reasons. EMagic did not write ver 7 Apple did. Without any track record of releasing bulletproof software I won't risk my livelihood and that of my employees or the creative genius of any of my clients or our in house creative staff on at the very best a novice attempt at professional recording software. Companies like Apple and Microsoft and many others in the software business for that matter have demonstrated an inability to release "mission critical" software. They rely on an attitude of "who cares we'll fix that bug in the next release". The results of which is what I have been reading here. Many on this list are completely furious and bewildered by version 7 and it's obviously flaky operation. Remember that apple may have no real motivation to make ver 7 work correctly on a G4 anyway. They made the G5 and if Logic 7 only runs well on that....well their solution would be "buy a G5". Howard ----- Original Message ----- From: To: Logic_Cafe@yahoogroups.com Sent: 2/3/2005 12:19:54 PM Subject: Re: [Logic_Cafe] imac comparison It really surprised me that the iMac was faster I find that hard to believe. And I wonder if they just ran one test on each machine and if some background processes might have been going on (there are a lot of those in X), or if they ran the same test multiple times, or different tests then took an average. I think a single test can always give screwy results. Just look at itunes when its ripping a CD to MP3... it can vary from 5 to 14x on the same CPU. >This should be very helpful for me to eventually decide on the iMac or Dual CPU 1.8 PowerMac. It would have been more interesting for us if they ran logic - with a lot of tracks and a lot of virtual instruments. I seem to recall something from a few years ago when the dual processors came out - that the midi timing is far superior on the dual processor since one was dedicated to audio only. I hope that the other processor is not just doing mundane tasks. If so, Apple could offer a dual G5 & G4 for less money where the G5 does the heavy lifting and the the G4 does the screen redraws and midi. Yahoo! Groups Links To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Logic_Cafe/ To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: Logic_Cafe-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Message
Re: [Logic_Cafe] imac comparison
2005-02-03 by Howard Lipp
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.