Mac Systems
2005-05-01 by gswerner2002
Yahoo Groups archive
Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:06 UTC
Thread
2005-05-01 by gswerner2002
Is a Mac system UNIX based in the same way old Windows systems were DOS based? Gary
2005-05-02 by Maurits van de Kamp
> Is a Mac system UNIX based in the same way old Windows systems were DOS > based? That's hard to compare. Win311and earlier were really DOS-programs, not operating systems. Win95/98 were developed onwards from DOS-code. WinNT and the likes are based on a Unix/VMS-like core but rewritten for Microsoft (by the original programmer of the VMS kernel) and made to look DOS-based (drive letters etc). The way Unix-derivatives like Mac OSX, Solaris, HPUX, BSD etc work, is that their companies bought a licence from Digital (the original creator of Unix) to use the Unix kernel sourcecode but modify and expand the system around it to make good use of the computer's specifics. Linux is similar, but its kernel is rewritten from scratch and therefore free. So the comparison with Windows and MSDOS would best fit Win95/98/ME, where the DOS-code can still be found inside (although with every release, Microsoft tried to convince us that MSDOS was completely gone, it was just compatible). :o) Maurits.
2005-05-02 by Dave Shirk
The way Unix-derivatives like Mac OSX, Solaris, HPUX, BSD etc work, is that
their companies bought a licence from Digital (the original creator of Unix)
to use the Unix kernel sourcecode but modify and expand the system around it
to make good use of the computer's specifics.
2005-05-02 by Maurits van de Kamp
> Sorry for the correction You're absolutely right, I was oversimplifying history a bit. Must be the early time of day. :o) Maurits.
2005-05-02 by Dave Shirk
You're absolutely right, I was oversimplifying history a bit. Must be the
early time of day. :o)
Maurits.
2005-05-02 by Maurits van de Kamp
> And I hate to be a stickler - but computer history > is Important to me! Please stickle.. wrong information should be corrected :o) And for the (ex)-Atari users here, we should of course not forget MiNT, also based on BSD, which is a kernel that doesn't fully replace Atari's native operating system TOS, but binds to it, creating a TOS-and-Unix-compatible operating system. OSX avant la lettre. :o) (I'm still using it actually) :o) Maurits.
2005-05-02 by gswerner2002
> > And I hate to be a stickler - but computer history > > is Important to me! > > Please stickle.. wrong information should be corrected :o) I've always worked in a Windows environment and have had the luxury of a nice stable environment since I use outboard recording and mixing but my reason for the primative question has everything to do with upgrading in the very near future. I'm not a programmer but have become very capable with Windows just because that's where I've been for all these years. When I expand my studio I'm gonna want to upgrade any and all software. Since I see no other software that compares to Logic, I have to familiarize myself with the Mac system. My question about UNIX was trying to see if all the different operating system names were just different versions through the evolution or if there have actually been different base operating systems and if certain names refer to certain operating systems. It's a very basic question but I'm totally unfamiliar with Mac and I'm just trying to find a place to plant my feet. Thanks for the info, Gary
2005-05-02 by Maurits van de Kamp
> for all these years. When I expand my studio I'm gonna want to upgrade > any and all software. Since I see no other software that compares to > Logic, I have to familiarize myself with the Mac system. Being used to Windows for so long you'll have some adjusting to do, but not too much. > My question about UNIX was trying to see if all the different operating > system names were just different versions through the evolution or if > there have actually been different base operating systems and if > certain names refer to certain operating systems. Well indeed there is a different base; all MacOS versions up to and including 9 were just evolutions (and based on Apple's own internals, no link to MSDOS or CP/M like base systems, nor Unix). OS-X is a complete rewrite based on BSD and is in fact incompatible to previous MacOS versions (at least on the bottom; when it comes to configuration the surface is somewhat similar). Since the user interface is pretty good and thoroughly designed, you'll find your way around easily without Unix knowledge although some underwater things might seem odd (for example file permissions are a common cause of confusion). If you have some Linux experience, you'll understand what's going on under the hood easily as well which makes it all even easier. Enjoy your Mac (you will) :o) Maurits.