Marcos Maniacs group photo

Yahoo Groups archive

Marcos Maniacs

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:07 UTC

Thread

Bigger Motors in wooden chassis?

Bigger Motors in wooden chassis?

2010-06-04 by bennywhiz

I think we are missing something here, the wooden chassis Marcos will not survive big engine swaps. It was designed for 130-150hp with the small rims. You cannot squeeze a v8 into a wood chassis there is no room, it barely takes the 4 cyl. motors. I've looked at the Ford Duratec, a fantastic motor, it's too tall and wide with nowhere to run headers. I would recommend upgrade your 1600 or go to the Pinto, more power less expense and loads of after-market go faster goodies, just my opinion.

John.

RE: [MarcosManiacs] Bigger Motors in wooden chassis?

2010-06-04 by Red Hot


Hi John,
I dont think you are quite correct; there were some V6 Ford powered wooden chassis cars. The wooden chassis was actually more rigid than the steel frame which was always a compromise to get it to fit under the same body. However I agree with you that the best option for this owner is to use the original engine or a close derivative of it. Even if one could get a larger engine in the gearbox and rear axle would be the weak points.
I raced the 1500 and 1600 wooden chassis cars in Europe from 1969 -75.
Roger


To: MarcosManiacs@yahoogroups.com
From: jaguar1964@...
Date: Fri, 4 Jun 2010 03:39:16 +0000
Subject: [MarcosManiacs] Bigger Motors in wooden chassis?

I think we are missing something here, the wooden chassis Marcos will not survive big engine swaps. It was designed for 130-150hp with the small rims. You cannot squeeze a v8 into a wood chassis there is no room, it barely takes the 4 cyl. motors. I've looked at the Ford Duratec, a fantastic motor, it's too tall and wide with nowhere to run headers. I would recommend upgrade your 1600 or go to the Pinto, more power less expense and loads of after-market go faster goodies, just my opinion.

John.



Get a new e-mail account with Hotmail – Free. Sign-up now.

RE: [MarcosManiacs] Bigger Motors in wooden chassis?

2010-06-04 by Bob Magnotti

Good day,
 
I run a warmed over 1600 cross flow in wood chassis #1579.  It has all the power I need and to be honest I think my set up is quicker than most other Marcos.  The car is light and well balanced.  Very quick on the road or track. 
 
 IMHO - any big motor can make you go fast, but what happens at the end of the straight away is more important.  I have driven many four cylinder cars that are much faster than a lot of the ground pounding 8 cylinder cars.
 
The wood chassis cars are so unique choose your modifications wisely.  There is a lot of potential power that can dependably developed in the Kent engine series.
 
Bob M


--- On Fri, 6/4/10, Red Hot <firstredhot1@...> wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
From: Red Hot <firstredhot1@...>
Subject: RE: [MarcosManiacs] Bigger Motors in wooden chassis?
To: marcosmaniacs@yahoogroups.com
Date: Friday, June 4, 2010, 12:14 AM


  




Hi John,
I dont think you are quite correct; there were some V6 Ford powered wooden chassis cars. The wooden chassis was actually more rigid than the steel frame which was always a compromise to get it to fit under the same body.  However I agree with you that the best option for this owner is to use the original engine or a close derivative of it. Even if one could get a larger engine in the gearbox and rear axle would be the weak points.
I raced the 1500 and 1600 wooden chassis cars in Europe from 1969 -75.
Roger




To: MarcosManiacs@ yahoogroups. com
From: jaguar1964@shaw. ca
Date: Fri, 4 Jun 2010 03:39:16 +0000
Subject: [MarcosManiacs] Bigger Motors in wooden chassis?

  


I think we are missing something here, the wooden chassis Marcos will not survive big engine swaps. It was designed for 130-150hp with the small rims. You cannot squeeze a v8 into a wood chassis there is no room, it barely takes the 4 cyl. motors. I've looked at the Ford Duratec, a fantastic motor, it's too tall and wide with nowhere to run headers. I would recommend upgrade your 1600 or go to the Pinto, more power less expense and loads of after-market go faster goodies, just my opinion.

John.






Get a new e-mail account with Hotmail – Free. Sign-up now.

Re: Bigger Motors in wooden chassis?

2010-06-04 by geirooye

I agree - as I've said before that a V8 is probably not a good solution, but please have a look at this:

[IMG]http://i601.photobucket.com/albums/tt94/EcurieEcosse_bucket/MarcosAnniversary/MarcosWoodenMonicaV83.jpg[/IMG]

[IMG]http://i601.photobucket.com/albums/tt94/EcurieEcosse_bucket/MarcosAnniversary/MarcosWoodenMonicaV85.jpg[/IMG]

It's a wooden chassis (and an early one at that) with an OHC V8.  It's not a big block US machine but still.

Pic taken at Prescott in August...

Re: Bigger Motors in wooden chassis?

2010-06-04 by John Carroll

Hi Roger,
I do agree that the wooden chassis has great stiffness, but a V6 is still smaller and lighter then a massive honking V8, I do remember seeing a Modsports V6 at Oulton Park many centuries ago, when he accelerated both his doors opened, traced down to the wooden chassis flexing. I do think the perfect engine would be the Lotus twincam, dry-sumped of course!
Are you still racing?
Regards, John.

Re: [MarcosManiacs] Re: Bigger Motors in wooden chassis?

2010-06-04 by Bob Magnotti

John,
 
You said "I do think the perfect engine would be the Lotus twincam, dry-sumped of course!"
 
...and I do agree with the twin cam.  At one time my car #5179 had a twin cam installed but the Vulcan modified crossflow was substituted before the car was shipped to the States.  
 
I wanted to put in the dry sump system but have been stumped as to the oil tank size and location for the tank.  Things get real complex to install the tank in the trunk.  Have you set up a wooden chassis Marcos with the dry sump system?
 
Bob Magnotti
Blue Ridge VA

--- On Fri, 6/4/10, John Carroll <jaguar1964@...> wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
From: John Carroll <jaguar1964@...>
Subject: [MarcosManiacs] Re: Bigger Motors in wooden chassis?
To: MarcosManiacs@yahoogroups.com
Date: Friday, June 4, 2010, 3:17 PM


  




Hi Roger,
 
I do agree that the wooden chassis has great stiffness, but a V6 is still smaller and lighter then a massive honking V8, I do remember seeing a Modsports V6 at Oulton Park many centuries ago, when he accelerated both his doors opened, traced down to the wooden chassis flexing. I do think the perfect engine would be the Lotus twincam, dry-sumped of course!
Are you still racing?
Regards, John.

RE: [MarcosManiacs] Re: Bigger Motors in wooden chassis?

2010-06-05 by Red Hot

Well chaps - I am not sure why you would want to use a dry sump motor in a Marcos. Certainly not necessary for the road. There is a problem with the aeration of the oil at continuous rpm over 8000 should you be thinking of doing that, but other than that the only thing that needs solving is to stop the oil in the sump sloshing around and leaving the pick up sucking air. When I was racing one I made a "winged" sump for extra capacity and replaced the original ()oil pickup with one with a smaller filter on it, built some vertical baffles and a horizontal one right across the deep part and all worked perfectly. (The reason to put a small filter on the pickup pipe is so that there is only a small hole in the horizontal baffle).
If you did want to use a dry sump system the place for the tank is right at the front of the passenger footwell with a false bulkhead to separate it from the passenger compartment. Apart from very long legged passengers no one would even notice it was there.
My only other comment is that in the UK I ran various road cars with the Lotus Twin Cam motor and none of them were very reliable but I had a Ford RS1600 Mk1 with an original BDA in it and did over 100,000 miles with no more than a new set of piston rings and bearing shells at about 75,000. In fact I used to use it to tow an open trailer with my race car on it. No big transporters in those days!
Best of luck!
Roger
To: MarcosManiacs@yahoogroups.com
From: rhdspritemk1@...
Date: Fri, 4 Jun 2010 16:14:30 -0700
Subject: Re: [MarcosManiacs] Re: Bigger Motors in wooden chassis?

John,
You said "I do think the perfect engine would be the Lotus twincam, dry-sumped of course!"
...and I do agree with the twin cam. At one time my car #5179 had a twin cam installed but the Vulcan modified crossflow was substituted before the car was shipped to the States.
I wanted to put in the dry sump system but have been stumped as to the oil tank size and location for the tank. Things get real complex to install the tank in the trunk. Have you set up a wooden chassis Marcos with the dry sump system?
Bob Magnotti
Blue Ridge VA

--- On Fri, 6/4/10, John Carroll ca> wrote:

From: John Carroll ca>
Subject: [MarcosManiacs] Re: Bigger Motors in wooden chassis?
To: MarcosManiacs@yahoogroups.com
Date: Friday, June 4, 2010, 3:17 PM

Hi Roger,
I do agree that the wooden chassis has great stiffness, but a V6 is still smaller and lighter then a massive honking V8, I do remember seeing a Modsports V6 at Oulton Park many centuries ago, when he accelerated both his doors opened, traced down to the wooden chassis flexing. I do think the perfect engine would be the Lotus twincam, dry-sumped of course!
Are you still racing?
Regards, John.



Get a new e-mail account with Hotmail – Free. Sign-up now.

Re: Bigger Motors in wooden chassis?

2010-06-05 by John Carroll

Bob,
I totally agree with what you say, light and nimble, Colin Chapman, the Walkett Bros. and Arthur Mallock all subscribed to that theory. I did a hillclimb with a TVR Tuscan 289 V8, I found that the Triumph front brakes at the first hairpin weren't quite up to the job! bought a Ginetta G4 1000cc cosworth, it was 4 seconds quicker....
So now I run Mallock U2 in Historics, 120hp weighs 800lb, it's fast enough!
John.

Re: Bigger Motors in wooden chassis?

2010-06-06 by geirooye

Hi John
I agree that most V6 engines are lighter than old style American V8s, but I think the Essex V6 used in the Marcos among others is an exception.  I know for a fact that a traditional small block Ford with normal modern aluminium heads and the T5 gear box weighs LESS than the Essex V6 with its 4+1 gear box as installed in the Marcos of around 1970. Shouldn't be possible but there are people out there actually doubting if the Essex engines are hollow at all, or if they are just massive iron all the way through :-)

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.