Mellotronists group photo

Yahoo Groups archive

Mellotronists

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:09 UTC

Message

Re: [Mellotronists] Re: Mtron & Wakeman

2007-03-30 by john barrick

No Mark, you're not.  I have M-tron, but am working on the real thing.  
If we set aside the purist argument for a moment, I'd say that M-tron's 
biggest weakness is the quality of its samples.  Some are fairly decent, 
but many are wretched - so noisy or so poorly sampled as to be 
unusable.  However, at $120, if it puts a smile on your face for even a 
few months - and you're not planning on getting the real thing anyway - 
I'd say you spent your money well.  You might seriously look at 
investing in the Pinder CD Rom and an old hardware sampler off of ebay 
for maybe three  to four times the cost (>$500?), for a much higher 
quality playback experience.  Least that's what I've heard.
best,
john barrick


Mark wrote:
> For $120 the sounds are ok, there are lots of them, unfortunately you
> can't mix them ( or at least I can't). For some of us they are all we
> are ever likely to have. Add some reverb to the strings and they sound
> pretty good. I am the only person on the list that doesn't own a real
> tron?
>
> Mark
>
> #MTR001085
>
> Ps I will be pleased if this appears even once
>

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.