I had use of a DX knob programmer for a while. I acted like such a brat my boss rented me one . I used it on the 7 and the TX rack and got the only truly good Yamaha FM sounds that I ever managed, still have a few in the can. I also decided that I was too old not to predominantly use knobs so I gave my DX7 and TX7 to my nephew. He is a whiz on them with the help of a fast computer and software. I abandoned a profoundly great sound generation method because it made me uncomfortable in a circumstance that discomfort wouldn't help me. Couldn't replicate the Mellotron even with the programmer. gw On 6/7/07, jonesalley <jonesalley@...> wrote: > > > > > > > > There's one for sale around here that I'll end up buying if they finally > drop the price a bit more. Always loved the sound of those things. > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Pomeroy Ranch > To: Mellotronists@yahoogroups.com > Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2007 9:38 PM > Subject: RE: [Mellotronists] return of the clones > > > > > The additive synthesis in the Synergy is an interesting opportunity for > pushing the envelope – just think if these things had a decent > Pentium/Motorola microprocessor instead of an archaic Toshiba Z80 chip….. > > Vance > > > I'm pretty sure that I never suggested the DX was a bad instrument. > > Not at all... Remember when I said that with digital synths, after 25 > to 40 years of digital music development that the best they can do is > to make bad copies of great instruments that are no longer in > production? I wanted to point out that the DX-7 is an exception to > that. The DX-7 was a digital synth that involved wicked creative use > of the technology, it wasn't trying to be a cheap copy of something > it's not, and that sort of character, innovation and joyful > exploration is rarely seen in digital synths. > > > >
Message
Re: [Mellotronists] return of the clones
2007-06-08 by gino wong
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.